User talk:Realitybeam

Welcome
Welcome...

Hello, Realitybeam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Twinsday Again, welcome! serioushat 11:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Madonna–whore complex, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Madonna–whore complex, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Owen&times; &#9742;  16:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
It seems your only purpose for editing Wikipedia is to introduce your own, unsourced statements on the Madonna–whore complex article, and you are unwilling to discuss things with other editors. This encyclopaedia is not an appropriate place for you to push your political beliefs. You are blocked from editing Wikipedia for one month. Further attempts to engage in edit wars will result in a permanent ban. Owen&times; &#9742;  10:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

"In sexual politics the view of women as either Madonnas or whores limits women's sexual expression, offering two mutually exclusive ways to construct a sexual identity.[4] The duality implies that women must assume subservient roles, either as madonnas to be protected or as whores to be punished by men.[5]"

Can you explain why you have a problem with some political edits, but not others?


 * The paragraph you quoted cites two sources for its claim. The sentence you keep adding cites none. We are not interested in your views or your original research. I suggest you spend this month to review WP:OR and WP:RS before editing again. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)