User talk:Realityvstruth

Welcome
Hello, Realityvstruth, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- PBS (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

However
To date you have made three edits:
 * 20:44, 24 February 2012 (diff) Armenian Genocide denial ‎ (Tag: references removed)
 * 19:26, 25 February 2012 (diff) Armenian Genocide denial ‎ (Tag: references removed)
 * 22:58, 25 February 2012 (diff) Armenian Genocide denial ‎ (This is a counterargument page for the genocide claim, and should therefore contain the arguments of scholars who deny the genocide. Editors should use the "Armenian Genocide" page for information that support the genocide.) (Tag: references removed)

This shows a familiarity with Wikipedia editing over and above the usual. As it is in a controversial area full disclosure is important, what other user names (including IP addresses) if any have you used in the past to edit any of the Armenian Genocide articles?

If you are a new user then see The three-revert rule and Sock puppetry -- PBS (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Your recent editing history at Armenian Genocide denial shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide denial
I have protected the page Armenian Genocide denial for four days. I expect responsible editors to discuss their differences on the talk page of the article and try in good faith to reach an agreement. --PBS (talk) 21:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions.  Tide  rolls  01:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Your recent editing history at Armenian Genocide denial shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''After your recent one-week block I would have thought that you learned not to edit-war, but unfortunately you started again. Before I file a report at WP:3RRN could you try and discuss the edit you have been trying to add to the lead for the past few months? At this point you have no consensus to add this edit to the article. So please go to the talkpage of the article and try to gather consensus before you add this information into the article. Thank you'' Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 20:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Armenian Genocide denial, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 21:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Armenian Genocide denial shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''You must realise that *independent* analysis is required of these primary documents. Please cite a secondary source not primary documents and stop edit-warring.'' Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Armenian Genocide denial, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)