User talk:Realkyhick/Archive 3

Lisa Wickham
Hi, please bear with me as I figure this out. I have seen where it was mentioned that my first external link in the previous edit was unsuitable because it was a scanned image, but I used it because it was off the Government of Trinidad and Tobago National Library Service list of prominent people of T&T. Please advise. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shandynelson (talk • contribs) 23:22, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Benj Franklin Savings and loan
I am feeling rather grumpy this evening, so my reply may be less than polite: I think that by threatening to delete an article over a few words that cast a tone slightly out of bounds, means you are drunk with the power of Wikipedia.

That may or may not imply an absence of good faith. The same may be said for threatening to delete an article.

You wrote: ''this article is written in a way that 1) expresses a non-neutral point of view and 2) is not encyclopedic in tone. The POV problems are so blatant that the article may face deletion if it is not immediately improved. Please rewrite this article without terminology that does not include such statements as "wrongly seized" and the like. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)''

"Wrongly siezed" is not subjective description of this case.

1) A Supreme Court decision that an ex post facto law was unconstitutional makes actions taken under that law "Wrong."

2) When the evidence is so clear that a trial court declares that the government was wrong WITHOUT A TRIAL, that too seems fairly clear cut. "Wrong."

3) There is no ongoing controversy, the matter is settled. The government was wrong on the face of it.  The courts have said the government was wrong.

Nevertheless I have removed the word "wrongly" from the opening paragraph. Please remove the demand for citations, or use your superior skills to create pointers to the external links already provided.

The only other non-neutral phraseology I can see is calling the federal regulatory body an 8-Trillion Pound Gorilla. A metaphor to be sure, but do you really think it inaccurate?

FWIW, despite the tone of these words, I'm a fiscal conservative. The government is wrong sometimes, and this is one of those times. This story is very much in context the week that Congress is voting on a 0.7 Trillion dollar bail out of the thrift industry, so let us try to find a way to keep it in Wikipedia, not kill it.

rosebud (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)scottrainey

scott@1100.us

Perhaps you should read this:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20434 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.142.203 (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

The V award
For your post on WR. I'm going back to my wikibreak now.

Steve Wyrick
Hi.... I work for Steve Wyrick as his Director of Marketing. I am the one who wrote the press release that has been issued to every publication and all over the web. I am not sure how I... the author of the content... am violating copyright. You can reach me at dspinney@stevewyrick.com... 702-777-9910. I simply wanted to add more information to his description which is outdated by more than a year. Please let me know the best method for getting accurate information onto your site.

Sept 25 2008 Darspin (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. If I can help in getting you materials to make Steve Wyrick's description more accurate, please let me know. Here are a couple of facts: Steve appeared on Vh1's Celebracadabra in March and April of 2008. The final two episodes were shot in the Steve Wyrick Theatre. Steve appeared on The Late Show with David Letterman on May 8, 2008 and the episode re-aired on July 10, 2008. He performed the "Blades of Death Challenge" and other guests on that episode included Paris Hilton and Panic at the Disco. TLC's American Chopper episode, airing October 9, features Steve Wyrick. The SW-1000 was built to commemorate his 1000th show at the Steve Wyrick Theatre in Miracle Mile Shops at Planet Hollywood (formerly Desert Passage at Aladdin). His namesake theatre, The Steve Wyrick Theatre opened January 27, 2007.

Next time you're in town give me a call and you can see what a great show it is for yourself.

DarleneDarspin (talk) 03:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Survey of English Usage
Dear Reallyhick,

I'm happy to discuss this content. I appreciate that what I've posted could be viewed as COI.

So: without special pleading, the facts are these.

There is nothing particularly controversial within the field that is posted here.

We're a university research group with a particular history, one that was/is reasonably interesting. We could get other linguists to 'big us up', but the list of our ex-associates is pretty long.

Rather than do that I thought it would be more straightforward to concentrate on matters of history and current fact. If you think that I've strayed over to self-publicity in some areas, do let me know.

Sean Wallis

Re: Logility
Actually, that is incorrect. Logility is in fact a NASDAQ-listed company (LGTY), as is its parent company, American Software (AMSWA). So both companies should be indexed by Wikipedia. I have since modified the content so that the text meets Wikipedia standards concerning advertising. As for copyright violations, text has been modified.

Logility
Here ya go -- User:Realkyhick/Logility. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

The Grand Oakland
Hello, What is the specific nature of your objection of this post? There are no advertsiements and we are simply posting information about a new building in Oakland. Darceyforbes (talk) 04:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Trying to Figure Out
Why you would care if an indie writer and filmmaker has a page on wikipedia or not?

Aren't there more important things in the world for you to be fretting over and fighting? Not meaning any malicious intent or to be impolite but I'm just trying to understand the mind of a person who spends their time flagging other people's articles on wikipedia.

Also, it's obvious that the person who posted the article on that writer chick doesn't know how to use wikipedia. Why wouldn't you help her and tell her ways to edit the article to keep it as opposed to just rushing to get it erased from the site? If you're going to be so concerned and involved about this article, why not do so in a positive and community-friendly way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SparkyJo (talk • contribs) 05:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Vancouver Vets Ride
Hello Realkyhick, I think you have recently deleted Vancouver Vets Ride which I created last night. I would like to give some info about it. It is a very popular bike ride, run for last 25 years in the Vancouver area. It is similar to the Toronto Donut Ride which is on Wiki. People from Toronto (Toronto Donut Ride) know about Vancouver Vets Ride and they are wondering why there is no info on Wiki on it. That is why I wanted to write about it. It is a very well know ride and all serious cyclists in Vancouver area know about it. I created the page with intend of expanding it. I was wondering if it is o.k. to proceed to eventually create a page similar to Toronto Donut Ride. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GSVANCOUVER (talk • contribs) 16:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice you posted on my talk page. I will try to collect some more info about the ride like press article etc. before trying again. --GSVANCOUVER (talk) 21:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

edits
Realkyhick,

I tried to counter the edit made by the person who chose to say the student section would have Coach Franklin fired.

I'm not a Finebaum fan, personally.

As for the Saban edit, I just want to point out how ridiculous the spin the wheel name game is, like the Obama ~ Osama edits I've seen sometimes.

That is all; I was unaware of the talk page. I could have responded to the user who made the initial Franklin edit with the addition I made.

Thank you.

DKinAU DKinAU (talk) 04:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for being a pain.
I appreciate you working with me on the 88-Keys artist page and I am sorry for being a pain and not following the rules.



Bmedick (talk) 17:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC) has given you a cookie! I'm glad we were able to solve this issue. I've learned a lot from editing and I'm really enjoying Wikipedia. I'm glad that I didn't get kicked off Wikipedia either, lol. Thanks again. Happy munching!

Help with Tandem Server
I cannot figure out why Tandem Server is blocked. I am not promoting Tandem Server CMS. Please help me figure out what the problem is. ThanksGeeewzzz (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Presumptive...
...is blocked indefinitely as a sock of User:Dereks1x. Thought you might like to know. A ni  Mate  13:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work 17:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Atnrrlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Atnrrlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Atnrrlogo.gif
A tag has been placed on Image:Atnrrlogo.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you tagged the page Image:Atnrrlogo.gif for speedy deletion with the reason "image or other media file that is a redundant copy, in the same file format, and at the same or lower quality/resolution, of Image:atnrrlogo.png, which is on Wikipedia, and all inward links have been updated". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the images are not in the same file format. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, or using the WP:IFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 09:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What is the appropriate course of action for this file? It was used in only one article, and has been replaced with a PNG version. It no longer serves any useful purpose. I originally uploaded the GIF image. Please advise. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It'll be deleted on or after next Friday as an orphaned fair use image. Stifle (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Why deleate stuff that exists in the real world even if you have not heard of it?
what gives?

--VicCityKIngs (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

JazzLanguage
This is my first time using Wikipedia so I wanted to make sure I followed all the rules. I will take your advice and write a single article first and use the sources I have here.

Thanks again for the info!

Jazzlanguage (talk) 13:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Wasilla Assembly of God
Hello, I see you were very active on the Wasilla Assembly of God talk page and I want to ask you have you seen the changes that have taken place over the last day or so. I just want to see if other people share my same concern or am I just letting my own pov get in the way. I'm really concerned about people reading the article with, in my opinion, the obvious pov it has. Do you think I'm right on this?Ltwin (talk) 18:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Regions Financial Corporation
A tag has been placed on Regions Financial Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nsevs •  Talk  05:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Disregard that, I didn't realize the vandal had blanked the page before putting spam there. Sorry. -- Nsevs •  Talk  05:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

zahara mossman
I thought that if someone makes history and is written about numerously it deems appropriate that it is on Wikipedia. Please let me know what is wrong with my article.Guacima (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)GuacimaGuacima (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Alpine club of canada vancovuer section
Hello,

i am trying to start a new page for our club, we got the idea from a current page VOC wiki (vancouver outdoor club). It is not advertising or selling anything. We hope to use it as a resource for Members, non-members and avid outdoors people to leave information regarding weather, trial conditions, trips & Courses and skill development.

Could you please re-activate the page if it fits your criteria or advise me on what I have to do to get it re-activated?

Cheers,

Steve Burgess —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burge333 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Alex Coles
OK. I rewrote it in a better style. What do you think? ----Sue Maberry (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

OK. Will do. Thanks.----Sue Maberry (talk) 13:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

CT Connect
It's more an essay by an industry veteran remembering a now-defunct company; it was deleted while I was considering the issue, so I had to restore it in order to tag it for problems; it was just not a good speedy. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Charlie Banacos article
Hello, An article was written about Charlie Banacos recently and there is a box saying "This article needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications." Charlie is a world-famous jazz teacher and has taught many famous jazz players. Terms used in jazz education are terms he created. I am confused about how to satisfy what the box at the top of the article is asking for. Thanks for your help! --Jumpn (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

"Drink 1, Give 10" page
(Alexandremih (talk) 17:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC))

Hello,

You just delete my "Drink 1, Give 10" that I posted because you said that it appear as an advertising page. The purpose of the page I posted is to explain the meanning and the benefit of the "Drink 1, Give 10" campaign from a partnership between Volvic and Unicef to provide water in Ethiopia. I would like to know how can I do for not have my page deleted.

Do you have some advices,

Thank you very much for your understanding.

Hi there realkyhick. dont worry about it, im just having a debate with a mormon friend and showing them what you can do on wikipedia. i will take it down later today

The Mobster's World
Hi, I was in the process of creating a new article. As I am new to the site, I was unsure of how to edit and save the articles. Upon reading your criteria, I realized that I did not put the underconstruction tag, which should have been done. I wanted to create a page such as Gemstone IV for this game. I am friends with the owner, and he has given me permission to make a page, and I have all the resources needed for the article. I am not the company and they do not pay me in anyway. I do however realize that I did make the mistake of not reading all of the "Create your first article" documentation, as I realize it would have saved me a lot of grief. You can reach me at nicole.t.le@gmail.com. If it is my login that is an issue, I am happy to create it under my usual login name of Nanumi. Thanks Loonygroup (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy tagging of Lotus (rock band)
I have removed the speedy deletion tag from this article. tagging it within 1 minute of its creation was rather hasty, and an article about a band that includes a list of album releases isn't a suitable candidate for speedy deletion anyway. Please consider using maintenance tags in future and allowing sufficient time for an article to be brought up to an acceptable standard. Thanks.--Michig (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion
I followed the instructions in Wikipedia and created a subpage on my user page, instead of creating a live page. I was going to ask other editors to help me improve it, then put it live. It seems fine to me, why should it be deleted? --Sebastien. (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok, but that is where all the information came from: his Facebook & official site, the Myspace is included as a link. And who is Sullivan? This is Andrew Allen we're talking about.

Yeah I understand. He's not well known, so thats all I could find on him unfortanutely.

Last November deletion
Last November is a notable band. There is no reason to delete this article. They are currently nominated "Top 40 Group of the Year" by New Music Weekly, a very notable Radio charting magazine. Their current single is at number 63 on the top 100 chart for NMW as well.

They have worked with notable producers, engineers, and mixers such as Steven Haigler (a platinum selling producer who has worked with fuel, oleander, brand new) Rodney Mills (produced Lynrd Skynrd)

Last November is signed to Southern Tracks Records, founded by Bill Lowery —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert pillgraham (talk • contribs) 20:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The article regarding Userneeds
I have written the following:

By practizing web 2.0 methodologies, the company has revolutionized the way Nordic research agencies make use of samples for online market research. Up until the emergence of Userneeds, larger research companies had sufficed in retaining small consumer panels for market research. The growing need for segment analysis combined with increased problems with panelist loyalty, forced many research companies to expand their incentives budgets in order to keep the panelists in the consumer panels.

Userneeds has chosen a different approach, building on the crowd sourcing principle of knowledge gathering. The primary incentive offered to Userneeds' panelists is information. By stating an opinion, a panelists gets the opportunity to know what others think about the relevant topic.

It was this new and revolutionizing method of gaining panel loyalty, that has made it possible for Userneeds to develop and maintain the largest consumer panels in the Nordic region.

Please let me know, if I need to maker further adjustments.

/Henrik Vincentz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincentz74 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Joan's on Third
Hi. I included several references in the article to establish notability and I'm happy to address any concerns about the content or the way the article is written. Please let me know. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Online Lecture
i dont understand why my entry is being deleted. i changed it just then so it's more like a "encyclopedia" entry or you can tell me what i could do to improve it as i'm only new to wikipedia feedback would be most welcome —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lau229 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Online Lecture entry
i see that my entry has been changed to include better information. I'm not sure to how to check if you did it or not but thanks anyhow. I'm new to Wikipedia and I'll learn more as i go along. Thanks again Lau229 ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lau229 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

questions
ok, i have noticed you just add a speedy deletion tag on my newly-created article. does that mean there is no way i can creat this kind of information on wikipedia? your answer will be welcomed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tang Wentao (talk • contribs) 06:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Lau229 troubles with wikipedia
hey Realkyhick, i have 2 articles that are being under consideration to be deleted but i have no idea why. can you please have a look at it for me and see why they are being deleted?. thanks man

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Republic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Nature

--Lau229 (talk) 06:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Lau229
ok man, i get it now i think. so i'll just look for references where these words are used by more than the author. i was wondering how long my articles would last if i didnt add more references right away. because i need some time to check out other books and stuff. a few days perhaps?

--Lau229 (talk) 07:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alabama State Fairgrounds
An article that you have been involved in editing, Alabama State Fairgrounds, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Alabama State Fairgrounds. Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 03:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
While I am hard at work to provide a more concise statement of the new mobility agenda entry (in my very rare available time) I do have a slight bone to pick with you about your 'conflict of interest' tag. This is not a product, I am not a salesperson, and I do not make money from it. My work on this is purely pro bono. To get a feel for how this works, let me point you to one component of the Agenda: the work we have been carrying out (without funding) to support carsharing in cities. The program is at www.carshare.newmobility.org. And if you click to http://recommendations.worldcarshare.com you will see the testimonials of dozens of people and public agencies in cities around the world who have benefited from our work on this. And it’s only one example. So please, “conflict of interest”. I really don’t think sol

On the other hand, if you feel wise enough about all this, why don’t you just cut the whole thing out. You can do this and I will not quarrel with you about it. Back to work. ericbritton (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hello. I noticed today that you were doing newpages patrolling but are not marking some of the pages you visit as patrolled. Though this is not mandatory in any way, and should not be done for all newpages, where appropriate it keeps your fellow patrollers from wasting time reviewing the same page multiple times. In any event, keep up the good work! - NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  04:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

G1 tagging
Hi there. Could I please remind you to tag pages for deletion under the G1 criteria only if they clearly meet the criteria of "nonsense"? Thanks. - NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  04:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

User:The Transhumanist/Cuisine by country list
I assume you were trying to set up a sub page in your user space. You neglected to put "User:" in front of the title, and also you transposed two letters in your user name. I've fixed it; your page is at User:The Transhumanist/Cuisine by country list now. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'm getting a little groggy.  But unfortunatly, I haven't been drinking any grog.  :)  Th e Tr ans hu man ist    03:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Sunday night sports wrap
Just an FYI - this article you proposed for deletion has had the template removed. I wasted a few minutes fixing the pile of typos and spelling mistakes before actually trying to read the thing, and it absolutely should be gone. I'd nom for deletion myself, but it's way too early where I am and I'm going back to bed. Majorclanger (talk) 12:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Sunday Night Sports Wrap
I am a little confused because i thought wikapedia was around so that people could post things where they couldn't usually post. I am a student at dean college and when i was told of the page for the sports wrap i thought it was cool. I have listened to every show, and know about many parents that do and that call in. To say that because the links have nothing to do with the website/article you should shut is wrong. the radio station did have a website but because of the college technology they could no longer keep it. There were links that did bring you to the school station web page, and by clicking on that you know it exists. Please do not take this down because everyone that listens to this show thinks its awesome, and its huge resume experience for the kids. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.251.95.10 (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The deletion of Pineapplia
I must ask why you wish to delete this it is real and is not inappropriate this country is real. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damien-holder (talk • contribs) 06:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TRGA,

Your comments about TRGA being about selling an organization are not valid. You cannot even purchase anything from their site. A professional event is being played next week in Las Vegas by these rules. These rule are an alternative to the USGA rules that have been destroying golf with technology. Several players were sent this text to post, and I had a few moment to do it tonight.

The TRGA is completely objective and well written. Your quick to jump to conclusions. I see you do this with other peoples sites as well.

Do your homework first. Don't assume. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozgolf (talk • contribs) 07:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey y'all!
We're going to be having our first Mississippi meetup next month, and I would love it if you'd like to come out! A few of us will be staying overnight, so if you feel up to it, we could have a meet and greet that night and then breakfast the next morning and talk about Wikipedia and everyone's areas of expertise. Let's show 'em how it's done Southern-style! Mike H. Fierce! 22:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa
I have nominated Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Charlie Banacos follow-up
I am wondering if the Charlie Banacos article now meets wikipedia standards. Mr. Banacos is also wondering if we could put some sort of restriction on who can add to his article. Thank you for your time and input. Jumpn (talk) 03:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Restriction? Absolutely not! There is no ownership of Wikipedia articles. No person can dictate who edits an article (except in the case of bans or blocks), and no person can prevent any information that satisfies Wikipedia's guidelines from being added to an article. A Wikipedia article is not a personal home page, blog, or the like. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I guess I didn't express myself correctly; Mr. Banacos is only worried about people saying erroneous things and how to prevent hurtful things from happening. I did not mean to set off any alarm bells and I regret not expressing the concern more precisely. I can assure you that he is not seeking self-promotion; he is not that kind of person in the least. The article is meant to show his mark in the jazz world. I was trying to prove who he is with the quotes, but I can now see what you mean about the peacock phrasing. Thank you for your time, input and for your patience with a newbie such as myself. Jumpn (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Erroneous additions to that article can be handled like erroneous additions to every article on Wikipedia: vigilance, reversions, explanations in edit summaries and on article and user talk pages, warnings where necessary to people committing outright vandalism. Nothing can be prevented (except further damage by people who have committed enough infractions to be blocked or the occasional protection of an article that is especially subject to vandalism). It has to be fixed after the fact. And there is no protection, and no right of protection, against that which is unfavorable, if it's factual, stated without bias, and supported by the citation of reliable sources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I have erased the quote list from the article. Jumpn (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello again. You said you could work on this article over the holidays. I'm wondering if you can help me now. Jumpn (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. I'm wondering how to satisfy the requirements to remove that one last notification box at the top of the Charlie Banacos' article. Thanks. Jumpn (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Non-encyclopedic content? Theological dispute? Personal research?
In my opinion, you are not being consistent in your evaluation. What is expressed in the article "The Masculine Gender ...," though perhaps inferior in writing style to the article "Comma Johanneum," from which it is linked, is no more non-encyclopedic in content and no more a theological dispute and no more personal research than what is expressed in the article "Comma Johanneum."

In both articles, the subject is the Johannine Comma. In both articles, there is disagreement on whether or not the Comma belongs in the text. In both articles, different sources expressing the various views on the subject are cited. In neither article is the author's personal opinion stated. None of the the three views presented in the article "The Masculine Gender ..." is the author's personal invention. To the contrary, those are in fact the three views that have been held by various people regarding this subject, as confirmed by the two cited sources. That is in fact what is out there.

So what's all this talk about "non-encyclopedic content" and "theological dispute" and "personal research?" If those accusations are true of the article "The Masculine Gender ...," then they are also true of the article "Comma Johanneum." Conversely, if they are not true of the article "Comma Johanneum," then neither are true of the article "The Masculine Gender ...." In applying these accusations to the one article but not to the other, you are not being consistent in your evaluation and you are showing personal prejudice. I submit that the article in question demonstrates more neutrality than do the ones who are making these accusations against it.

As for the writing style, maybe the article is inferior in style. Perhaps YOU should fix it instead of complaining about it and asking for its deletion. I myself don't know how to write it better than it is written. However, the information presented in the article is valid information, and it is NOT personal research, and it IS pertinent to the information presented in the the article "Comma Johanneum," and it DOES cite two sources (Dr. Wallace and Dr. Hills; if you click the links ["pages 331-332" and "chapter 8" in the text of the article], you can read what they say about it yourself) that attest to the three views which have been held by various people regarding this subject, which are explained in the article in question.

7Jim7 (talk) 14:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome.
But my info is not being accepted here. Such a shame. you can't even add info that you know to be true. Sad.... Themyldeone (talk) 21:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Themyldeone

Material known to be true.
Is this about the super distortion in the neck of the dimebag razorback rust? I can get a link to a dean dealer who has them in stock with correct specs as listed on deans web site. Let me know and I will then include it.Themyldeone (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you kindly. I am still lost at exactly how to do this so, i'll be making no more contributions until I learn how to work this place.Themyldeone (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:WICU
Any idea what to do with this? It's kinda gotten nowhere in the whole time it's been up, and it basically seems like a more mudddled, less clearly focused WP:ARS. I'm tempted to just tag it as inactive as it's never really accomplished anything in the year-plus it's been open. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say tagging it as inactive would be a good idea. Then we can delete all the templates. I can't imagine there being any objection. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So what do you think of this idea? Just tag it as historical and delete the templates/subpages/etc.? Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Aryana farshad
Sourcing has now jumped waaaay over the bar.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You'll love this:  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Awww
Won't you please keep Committee for Immediate Nuclear War? Bstone (talk) 03:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I just can't stand it
Sorry i'm just blowing some steam cause i'm pissed off from this whole situation. It just seems that me and my friends can never get articles through because of "speedy deletion". And it always seems the same mods are targeting us, it just sucks... Antony1103 (talk) 06:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antony1103 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Although the one recent one was legit the others were me being pissed off. Me and a few of my friends have made attempts to add legitimate articles, mainly in the aquarium and snowboarding hobbies. Most were deleted within several minutes for no apparent reason other than their claiming to be no outside links, when most had at least 2 or 3. And this was coming from 3 or 4 of the same mods, which is why i view it as an attack against me. Antony1103 (talk) 06:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Flagganagga
I fail to see how the article that I recently wrote should be speedily deleted. I realise that there is a lack of citations, but one must realise that when dealing with colloquial expressions written sources are few and far between (if any exist at all). It is important to realise that just because something doesn't appear on the written page, that doesn't mean it is not fact. You would do well to remember this in future instead of trying to boost your own Wikipedia edit statistics by making pointless changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysterycobra (talk • contribs) 16:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A RETARD. NOW PLEASE STOP HARASSING ME. TAHNKYOU. - BigDunc   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysterycobra (talk • contribs) 16:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

"Fashion Story"
pls, explain why did u mark for deletion my article "fashion story".

see the answer to your arguments on my talk page GeoffBarrenger (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC) updated GeoffBarrenger (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

The Lickets
Your removal of the speedy-delete notice from The Lickets did not abide by Wikipedia policy. Merely releasing albums is not a criteria of notability. Many musical groups release multiple albums but are still not notable. Please refrain from using this rationale in the future, as it is contrary to CSD policy. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you're mistaken with that one. There is a distinction between an article being liable to speedy deletion under CSD:A7 and being non-notable — to avoid speedy deletion, the article need just give the merest hint why the subject might be notable. With respect, I think it is you that needs to read over the speedy deletion policy. Stifle (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No, the "merest hint" of notability is not sufficient. All sorts of bands give mere hints of notability that are obviously not enough to avoid speedy deletion. I have been marking such articles for speedy deletion for years now. I think I know the drill. Since you insist on removing the SD notice, I have ben forced to take the article to the tedious AfD process, where the article will inevitably be deleted. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't say I agree with you on that one, but I doubt I'll change your mind. Happy Christmas (or other religious or non-religious festival, if you celebrate one). Stifle (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC).

Added chart positions. A little confused by your pursuit of this one. Have you researched this?

Indestructible Regime
Could you please send me a copy of "Indestructible Regime"? This was a page of mine that you deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavinvox (talk • contribs) 18:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

The Lickets deletion
Added chart positions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chalfantsandilands (talk • contribs) 18:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC) There are two ways to do this. By linking to radio websites that still have these positions up, (Some do), or by linking to pay only services like LIYL and CMJ. Which should I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chalfantsandilands (talk • contribs) 19:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of The Rip (band)
I see no good reason why you propose to destroy this article- I am currently writing it, and it is by no means finished. Just leave it, and I will sort it, OK?

Are you slightly Wiki-power-crazed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theriponline (talk • contribs) 19:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Benj Franklin Savings and loan
I am feeling rather grumpy this evening, so my reply may be less than polite: I think that by threatening to delete an article over a few words that cast a tone slightly out of bounds, means you are drunk with the power of Wikipedia.

That may or may not imply an absence of good faith. The same may be said for threatening to delete an article.

You wrote: ''this article is written in a way that 1) expresses a non-neutral point of view and 2) is not encyclopedic in tone. The POV problems are so blatant that the article may face deletion if it is not immediately improved. Please rewrite this article without terminology that does not include such statements as "wrongly seized" and the like. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)''

"Wrongly siezed" is not subjective description of this case.

1) A Supreme Court decision that an ex post facto law was unconstitutional makes actions taken under that law "Wrong."

2) When the evidence is so clear that a trial court declares that the government was wrong WITHOUT A TRIAL, that too seems fairly clear cut. "Wrong."

3) There is no ongoing controversy, the matter is settled. The government was wrong on the face of it.  The courts have said the government was wrong.

Nevertheless I have removed the word "wrongly" from the opening paragraph. Please remove the demand for citations, or use your superior skills to create pointers to the external links already provided.

The only other non-neutral phraseology I can see is calling the federal regulatory body an 8-Trillion Pound Gorilla. A metaphor to be sure, but do you really think it inaccurate?

FWIW, despite the tone of these words, I'm a fiscal conservative. The government is wrong sometimes, and this is one of those times. This story is very much in context the week that Congress is voting on a 0.7 Trillion dollar bail out of the thrift industry, so let us try to find a way to keep it in Wikipedia, not kill it.

rosebud (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)scottrainey

scott@1100.us

Perhaps you should read this:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20434 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.142.203 (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

The V award
For your post on WR. I'm going back to my wikibreak now.

Steve Wyrick
Hi.... I work for Steve Wyrick as his Director of Marketing. I am the one who wrote the press release that has been issued to every publication and all over the web. I am not sure how I... the author of the content... am violating copyright. You can reach me at dspinney@stevewyrick.com... 702-777-9910. I simply wanted to add more information to his description which is outdated by more than a year. Please let me know the best method for getting accurate information onto your site.

Sept 25 2008 Darspin (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. If I can help in getting you materials to make Steve Wyrick's description more accurate, please let me know. Here are a couple of facts: Steve appeared on Vh1's Celebracadabra in March and April of 2008. The final two episodes were shot in the Steve Wyrick Theatre. Steve appeared on The Late Show with David Letterman on May 8, 2008 and the episode re-aired on July 10, 2008. He performed the "Blades of Death Challenge" and other guests on that episode included Paris Hilton and Panic at the Disco. TLC's American Chopper episode, airing October 9, features Steve Wyrick. The SW-1000 was built to commemorate his 1000th show at the Steve Wyrick Theatre in Miracle Mile Shops at Planet Hollywood (formerly Desert Passage at Aladdin). His namesake theatre, The Steve Wyrick Theatre opened January 27, 2007.

Next time you're in town give me a call and you can see what a great show it is for yourself.

DarleneDarspin (talk) 03:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Survey of English Usage
Dear Reallyhick,

I'm happy to discuss this content. I appreciate that what I've posted could be viewed as COI.

So: without special pleading, the facts are these.

There is nothing particularly controversial within the field that is posted here.

We're a university research group with a particular history, one that was/is reasonably interesting. We could get other linguists to 'big us up', but the list of our ex-associates is pretty long.

Rather than do that I thought it would be more straightforward to concentrate on matters of history and current fact. If you think that I've strayed over to self-publicity in some areas, do let me know.

Sean Wallis

Re: Logility
Actually, that is incorrect. Logility is in fact a NASDAQ-listed company (LGTY), as is its parent company, American Software (AMSWA). So both companies should be indexed by Wikipedia. I have since modified the content so that the text meets Wikipedia standards concerning advertising. As for copyright violations, text has been modified.

Logility
Here ya go -- User:Realkyhick/Logility. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

The Grand Oakland
Hello, What is the specific nature of your objection of this post? There are no advertsiements and we are simply posting information about a new building in Oakland. Darceyforbes (talk) 04:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Trying to Figure Out
Why you would care if an indie writer and filmmaker has a page on wikipedia or not?

Aren't there more important things in the world for you to be fretting over and fighting? Not meaning any malicious intent or to be impolite but I'm just trying to understand the mind of a person who spends their time flagging other people's articles on wikipedia.

Also, it's obvious that the person who posted the article on that writer chick doesn't know how to use wikipedia. Why wouldn't you help her and tell her ways to edit the article to keep it as opposed to just rushing to get it erased from the site? If you're going to be so concerned and involved about this article, why not do so in a positive and community-friendly way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SparkyJo (talk • contribs) 05:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Vancouver Vets Ride
Hello Realkyhick, I think you have recently deleted Vancouver Vets Ride which I created last night. I would like to give some info about it. It is a very popular bike ride, run for last 25 years in the Vancouver area. It is similar to the Toronto Donut Ride which is on Wiki. People from Toronto (Toronto Donut Ride) know about Vancouver Vets Ride and they are wondering why there is no info on Wiki on it. That is why I wanted to write about it. It is a very well know ride and all serious cyclists in Vancouver area know about it. I created the page with intend of expanding it. I was wondering if it is o.k. to proceed to eventually create a page similar to Toronto Donut Ride. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GSVANCOUVER (talk • contribs) 16:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice you posted on my talk page. I will try to collect some more info about the ride like press article etc. before trying again. --GSVANCOUVER (talk) 21:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

edits
Realkyhick,

I tried to counter the edit made by the person who chose to say the student section would have Coach Franklin fired.

I'm not a Finebaum fan, personally.

As for the Saban edit, I just want to point out how ridiculous the spin the wheel name game is, like the Obama ~ Osama edits I've seen sometimes.

That is all; I was unaware of the talk page. I could have responded to the user who made the initial Franklin edit with the addition I made.

Thank you.

DKinAU DKinAU (talk) 04:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for being a pain.
I appreciate you working with me on the 88-Keys artist page and I am sorry for being a pain and not following the rules.



Bmedick (talk) 17:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC) has given you a cookie! I'm glad we were able to solve this issue. I've learned a lot from editing and I'm really enjoying Wikipedia. I'm glad that I didn't get kicked off Wikipedia either, lol. Thanks again. Happy munching!

Help with Tandem Server
I cannot figure out why Tandem Server is blocked. I am not promoting Tandem Server CMS. Please help me figure out what the problem is. ThanksGeeewzzz (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Presumptive...
...is blocked indefinitely as a sock of User:Dereks1x. Thought you might like to know. A ni  Mate  13:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work 17:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Atnrrlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Atnrrlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Atnrrlogo.gif
A tag has been placed on Image:Atnrrlogo.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you tagged the page Image:Atnrrlogo.gif for speedy deletion with the reason "image or other media file that is a redundant copy, in the same file format, and at the same or lower quality/resolution, of Image:atnrrlogo.png, which is on Wikipedia, and all inward links have been updated". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the images are not in the same file format. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, or using the WP:IFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 09:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What is the appropriate course of action for this file? It was used in only one article, and has been replaced with a PNG version. It no longer serves any useful purpose. I originally uploaded the GIF image. Please advise. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It'll be deleted on or after next Friday as an orphaned fair use image. Stifle (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Why deleate stuff that exists in the real world even if you have not heard of it?
what gives?

--VicCityKIngs (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)