User talk:Realpinkpanthers

August 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pink Panthers, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

You claim that my edit to the Pink Panthers page was not constructive? based on what references are you claiming that and what makes you an expert in this theme? I talked to the real pink panthers and wrote the book about them for 3 years, and how can you claim that my input was not constructive without even reading the book and the robberies which were explained in detail in this 500-page book? I would understand that you read the book and then may claim that it is not good enough, and again I would ask you based on which references are you an expert in this theme?
 * No, the onus is on you to provide reliable sources for your additions. Reliable sources means published, independent sources - see WP:RS for more details. And this is an encyclopedia, we do not use such phrases as "shocking details were revealed". and lastly when one user reverts your edits as self promotional and self published, simply adding them back again (and again, and again) is not going to work - see WP:3RR. You might want to read WP:COI as well. IdreamofJeanie IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pink Panthers, you may be blocked from editing.   IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

I am vandalizing Wikipedia? I spent 3 years interviewing the real pink panthers, talking to the police sources, checking the official court documents - which resulted in the 500-page book on that subject matter, which I am simply trying to reference here? How can that reference be narrated here for you not to be upset and publish that reference? Can you help me because I don't know what to put there - it is a true story which describes the Pink Panthers characters, their principles, a system of work and organizational structure, tactical patterns of action and logistical processes, described through the preparing and carrying out robberies in Antwerp, London, Tokyo, Paris, Amsterdam, St. Tropez and Dubai. The background story shows the entire process of the diamond business, from relentless exploitation of rich deposits of poor third-world countries to the intertwining of the diamond business with other criminal cartels.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pink Panthers.   -- Arcaist  contribs  • talk  16:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Feel free to re-insert information from the book a) with proper referencing (i.e. page numbers); b) without sensationalizing language as IdreamofJeanie has outlined ("shocking details", "book caused a lot of turmoil" etc.); c) without a direct link to your own book in the Kindle store, as that's a blatant violation of the WP:SELFPROMOTE principle. If you're unsure what you can add, discuss it on the Talk page, rather than constantly reverting edits that were well explained to you. -- Arcaist  contribs  • talk  16:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

No need, I am gone for good... why would I waste my time on chat-wars with semi-retarded bots/editors who don't have a clue about the subject matter, yet are controlling the commenting on that subject matter... people told me not to waste my time on Wikipedia, now I know why...


 * Well, then we're sorry to see you go - Wikipedia needs experts sharing their knowledge. I mean, how about you really improved the article instead? After all, it's not great in its current form. Edit the story, add commentary and sources, link to documents, actually contribute something substantially, instead of advertising your book? You certainly had that chance, but chose to just insert your blurb and link over and over. If you opened an encyclopedia and under "Car, by Mike Smith", you'd find "The car is fascinating. Read all the history, amazing details, and shocking revelations in Mike Smith's book", would you feel well informed?
 * Oh, and namecalling only shows you're out of arguments. -- Arcaist  contribs  • talk  18:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I will add some facts from the book with page reference and it will match the current article style, for example, the article mentions that they had multiple documents and I will reference the page in the book where it is explained in detail how they obtained those multiple documents... if that comment is not approved, I will quit trying and let the other "experts" explain this subject... Arcaist, thank you for proper guidance, my frustration was mostly caused by the other Jeanie user - I admit that I maybe was lazy in going into detail but I think this book is a valuable reference as it explains in detail many secrets of the real pink panthers... I will not post a link to the book anymore, I thought I can post it is you mentioned the documentary about them and that documentary had nothing true in it with exception of real heist footage obtained from the security cameras...