User talk:Realsarahhopkins

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Brooklyn Jade


A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Brooklyn Jade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=3078716&page=1 and lennyletter.com/story/trans-son-writes-letter-to-his-mother. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 07:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

It's rediculouse how you think it's copyright, I made it on Open Office Document. It's NOT from other websites.

July 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Help desk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flix11 (talk) 07:35, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

We are willing to help you, but you need to stop the personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brooklyn Jade


A tag has been placed on Draft:Brooklyn Jade, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Flix11 (talk) 08:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Not copyright content. I created an artical about a person and use Open Office document, then I copied and past that into wikipedia. It was deleted because the user thinks it's copyright. IT IS NOT. I have made an official complaint about the Admin users to the Wikipedia founders Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger.
 * Instead of overwriting the template in the block notice, you need to place it outside the block notice for proper display. Jimmy Wales does not get involved in such matters typically. If you calmly discuss this, we can help you. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


 * While blocked, you can only use this page to request unblock(which you still need to do properly as noted above). What you wrote is still stored in the edit history so it can be retrieved later.  You will also need to address the connection you seem to have with Brooklyn Jade. Note that documents that are only in private hands do not establish that Brooklyn Jade meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable artist or the more general notable person. Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about persons. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

I did the interview with her Psychologist and while Brooklyn was there. Does interview report need to be shown public as well ?.
 * Private interviews or any source only in private hands are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Wikipedia only summarizes what publicly available, professionally published independent reliable sources state about article subjects.  If you just want to tell the world about Brooklyn, you should use social media or a personal website, not Wikipedia. Please review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

It was not a private interview or private hands, The interview was soley done for this reason, How do you think celebrities share their infomation ?, Reporters/writers/people find the facts so no conflict of interest will evolve into something bad, I have the official report about Brooklyn regarding her life hence the article. Reporters/writers do the interviews just like this. Then I make it public just like other reporters/writers do. I'm sharing my article about Brooklyn Jade. I think your targeting her because she's transgender that's why you and other admin users wont approve the article page about her. Have you even looked at the page I made and read it ?. I don't think you have. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Brooklyn_Jade
 * I have, and I am extremely supportive of LGBT human beings and we have many articles about such humans. That is not the issue. What you describe is a private interview at least as far as Wikipedia is concerned.  Wikipedia is not a place to post source materials; we are only interested in what independent sources say about source information.  If others unaffiliated with you like news reporters choose to write articles based on your interview, there might be something there. You will need to make your interview public somewhere else. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Do you understand what your saying ?. It's not wikipedia deleting the article its you and other admin users. My article has been submited just like any other reporter or writer releasing public information about a person. I have the facts and I have provided the facts. My article DOES NOT have or show any kind of Conflict of Interest towards Brooklyn Jade. She has seen this article and approved it, you welcome to contact her yourself on instagram brooklynjadeofficial and ask her for yourself. And of course you will say you support LGBT because who would want a defamation law suit ?. You know the article is correct, You & other users said the only problem was I can't copy & past it from my word document and it must be typed into the page.

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats and advertising or promotion.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Since you seem to only be here to tell the world about Brooklyn Jade, have a conflict of interest in doing so, refuse to heed what you are being told, and have made a legal threat, I have now blocked you indefinitely. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Legal threat ? It's a promise and it seems I'm correct. The court system can find the user ( Your user name ) details to take this further. This will be a Defamation law suit.

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Since you doubled down, I have removed your ability to edit this page. Your or your attorneys can communicate with the Wikimedia Foundation's legal staff by following the instructions at WP:LEGAL. I'm not sure how it is defamation for me to say that I support someone expressing their sexual identity. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)