User talk:Realwwhistory

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kemet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kemet was changed by Realwwhistory (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935134 on 2015-01-05T02:31:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * In case there was any question, you're copying content from http://realhistoryww.com/ which, and perhaps wouldn't mind having a look, isn't much of a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 02:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It fails WP:SOURCE as it is not a "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." It is anonymous and fails WP:SPS. And in any case it contains copyvio links (links containing material under copyright) and that alone is sufficient reason to say it can't be used. Dougweller (talk) 13:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Does it fail WP:EL for Afrocentrism or Pseudohistory? Because I have visited the site and its seems a perfect example of Afrocentrism and represents their pseudohistory. I am not seeing the copyright violation, I see some images of text from books used just like every other website cites references.--Inayity (talk) 15:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)