User talk:Realybigfurby

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cougar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cougar was changed by Realybigfurby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949308 on 2015-03-04T03:09:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Kurt Christoph Graf von Schwerin. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hofstadter-Moebius loop
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hofstadter-Moebius loop, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://everything2.com/title/Hofstadter-Moebius+loop.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hofstadter-Moebius loop


A tag has been placed on Hofstadter-Moebius loop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://everything2.com/title/Hofstadter-Moebius+loop. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - MrX 02:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Red Miller has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Red Miller was changed by Realybigfurby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951802 on 2015-03-11T12:06:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Josh was changed by Realybigfurby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912129 on 2015-03-11T12:11:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Du Fu, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Du Fu was changed by Realybigfurby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868424 on 2015-03-11T12:14:09+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Final warning
A second disruptive edit on your part to the same article was caught by a human editor and not ClueBot. Dude, you're pushing your luck. You completely broke the infobox template by introducing nonsense syntax. This couldn't possibly have gone unnoticed. Why don't you try fixing a simple grammatical error in some article and then build up from there? In the long run, it's far more rewarding. I did just that myself this morning at Hannibal's crossing of the Alps, which is a pretty interesting story, by the way, and a good example of an article much in need of further concern and improvement.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Du Fu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

&mdash; MaxEnt 20:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)