User talk:Reaper Eternal/Archive 36

Revertion of my speedy deletion nomination
there is a draft article called "When will we run out of" and it is a weird article. It talks about running out of wheat or something. So I tried to nominate is for SD because it is nonsense and you reverted it because it is a draft. I understand that, but what should we do with the article now? It will get declined but I mostly am asking this because if this happens to me again, I don't know what to do in a situation like this haha. Bigeshjen (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Bigeshjen
 * G1 doesn't apply to Drafts? Are you sure? -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * G1 doesn't apply to drafts in progress, or drafts actively being edited would constantly be deleted. The draft namespace is intended to give editors space to develop their articles, but, obviously, it is also not a sandbox for editing tests or gibberish (G2 or G1 applies here). However, users unfamiliar with wikitext will often include broken formatting in their articles (that they later remove) which can appear like editing tests or gibberish.
 * In this case, the article had next to no content other than the following statement: "The world is on course to run out of wheat by August 2022 due to the Ukrainian war." This is a reference to this news article. While this probably does not merit its own Wikipedia article, the content is valid and could potentially be included in an article on the Ukraine-Russia war. It is not gibberish, and it is certainly not vandalism (courtesy pings to Anthony Bradbury and LPS and MLP Fan). The only reason this article might look like gibberish was the editor had a random table in the article, probably accidentally due to the aforementioned lack of knowledge of wikitext.
 * I'm going to be honest here: You guys were rather bitey, and the CSD deletion for "vandalism" was flat-out wrong.
 * In the future, Bigeshjen, you might want to wait a bit before tagging and/or approach the author and ask them what they're talking about. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello there. I am replying in this conversation because I was pinged. Thank you for the clarification of G1's application; I did not find anything about it being inapplicable to drafts in progress in WP:G1. The draft I tagged for deletion, along with a few other drafts I tagged under G3, got deleted by.
 * Next, I would like to explain why I did this. I was patrolling recent changes when I came across edits to Draft:A Towel By Another Name. Recognizing that the draft consisted of pure vandalism, I tagged it for deletion. Then, I went to Special:NewPages to look for other inappropriate drafts. I found a lot of drafts that had problems (more when I was going through new pages to find the drafts I encountered), such as the subject's inherent lack of notability or providing no context about the subject. I wasn't sure about what to do with those because the speedy deletion criteria they satisfy only applies to articles, so I did not tag them with G1, G2, etc. However, I filed an MfD for Draft:A YOUNG SINGER/RAPPING/HIP HOP ARTIST reece.
 * In my opinion, I think those drafts I encountered, including the one originally tagged, are not going to be edited after a few edits. As an editor who specializes in anti-vandalism, I naturally want to get rid of inappropriate pages. I know I could wait for G13 to apply, but I think I do not want to wait for six months for the problematic drafts to be deleted.
 * After reading your reply, I think that you were right that it was wrong to tag the subject draft for deletion under G3, even if it did not make much sense to me. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 14:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * ..and completely unrelated, but holy shizz Reaper, you must have used up an entire years' worth of CU pixie dust at Sockpuppet investigations/Custodi2! I need a nap just thinking about it.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm thinking it was a paid editing farm. That wasted a couple hours of my evening.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Way to take one for the team! Regarding the G1 bit, I would have declined as well because it wasn't patent nonsense, but your comment that G1 didn't apply to drafts threw me for a loop. Thought I'd interpreted it wrong all this time and may have deleted some drafts out of process at some point. Anyhoo, back to the grind.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

User:Oyoin/Sample page‎
I'm usually pretty lax with user sandboxes, but a sandbox that is just to change part of the sample text to "CUNT"? I thought G3 would apply to that, but it's not a hill I'm going to die on (it is a user page at the end of the day). Singularity42 (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2022 (UTC)e
 * I've removed the profanity. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Now they are trolling me and/or personally attacking me: . Joy. Singularity42 (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sigh. I guess he just wants to be a troll. Well, trolls aren't welcome here, so I have blocked him indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Reviewing my case
Hi, Reaper Eternal. I didn't know where to post this, as the SPI has been closed. I also usually don't post at this time, but I was busy earlier and, due to the nature of the latest comment at the SPI page, I thought I should post soon instead of waiting. You and RoySmith are the two CUs who seem to have considered the CU and behavioural evidence in the most recent Daner's Creek SPI investigations. A concern that Johnuniq is involved and leans toward me not being a sock has been entered. You may have seen that I entered a concern that evidence has been shared with two admins who lean in the other direction. Tamzin was specifically pinged to an ANI thread about me because of this belief. So I wouldn't think it compromises things if Johnuniq were also allowed to review the evidence. He has also asked about reviewing the evidence before blocking.

That said, as you and RoySmith seem to be the most neutral reviewing the case, would it not be reasonable to put in this request that Tamzin pass the new behavioural evidence over to you and RoySmith so that you can also review it, if you're willing? I've been through a thorough CU analysis, it seems, and a thorough behavioural analysis. And now the user who pinged Tamzin has thrown in more information to review after the results were not the ones they wanted. RoySmith's comment here reflects my view of the SPI, that there's more and more pressing so that the outcome ends with me blocked. At this point, I'd probably request an unblock if blocked. But I'd rather the evidence be reviewed by neutral participants before, not after. The burden of evidence to prove I'm not a sock seems unusually higher than it is for other sock cases, and "no, not a sock" appears to be the unacceptable answer. I feel like I'm stepping on the shells of eggs and can't say anything about this case without getting blocked, and that even asking this will be considered disruptive.

If you and RoySmith would prefer to ignore this post because of the heat the SPI has attracted, I'll understand. GBFEE (talk) 04:55, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Since I was pinged, I will note: Once I'm done with my analysis, whatever I find, the results will be available to any admin or SPI clerk on request. Currently that analysis is being delayed due to some technical issues. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 05:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * One concern I have is others not having the chance to review before you make the decision to block or not, if you choose that. Leaving the choice in the hands of one admin after CU and behavioural evidence have already come back negative or lacking hard evidence seems to be a very unusual process. Because of your previous statements on the topic, it's concerning to me for a similar reason it would be concerning to others if the decision were unilaterally Johnuniq's and he said there was no evidence based on his analysis. GBFEE (talk) 05:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I would not block you without consulting with other admins. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 07:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I only ask that the pool of reviewing admins consist of more than those who take a hard stance that I'm a sock. That's why I've asked for Reaper Eternal and RoySmith to also review. Ultimately, how much more hands-on they want to be with the case is their decision. GBFEE (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * To clarify, I have not expressed an opinion about who is or who isn't a sock. That's because I don't know and have not had the time or energy to fully investigate. Those at the SPI who question my INVOLVED status also seem to think I have a view, but that's not correct. I have a long familiarity with Flyer's editing and have been dismayed that recent aspersions have been unchallenged. For an important case like this, it's not satisfactory to block anyone for "disruption" without precise examples of the problem (or a link to where the examples are shown). Also, any sock tells that can be revealed in public should be. I understand that it is often undesirable to give a full public explanation concerning why someone has been blocked as a sock but I hope that those discussing non-public evidence consider that perceived similarities can have innocent explanations, as I mentioned at the SPI. I would be happy to review evidence, if admins want that. Johnuniq (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Johnuniq, I don't think you were being non-neutral. I think you were being objective. But since there's opinions that take a different view of your participation, I used that as a comparison above. Thank you for offering your assessments. GBFEE (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Remove personal info
Hi!

Liked your username the most out of the list, so hereby a request for personal information deletion.

Could you delete the revision on my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Larcorba where my full name is visible? Thanks a lot!Larcorba (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 Have a Happy Adminship Anniversary! Hey there Reaper Eternal, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.

LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 19:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC) On behalf of the Birthday Committee

The Signpost: 1 August 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Deleting old, offensive revision history on my personal page.
Hi Brian, I am requesting deletion of older versions of my user page. About 17 years ago I had been dealing with a colleague who was leaving offensive posts all over the early social media, and was making changes to my page. Recently this history was brought to my attention by a friend.

The two offensive history entries are posted by the IP address 205.188.116.66 and they appear to meet the Revision deletion criteria.

I'm not skilled in Wikipedia to be honest, so pardon me if this request isn't following the right protocol. Motorbikematt (talk) 05:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's pretty offensive, so I've removed both edits. Your request is fine&mdash;there's no fixed protocol for requesting removal of obscene content like that. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Rachel Chaikof notability: 12 October 2022
Hi there! Thanks for the info on speedy deletion in the living person biography about Rachel Chaikof. In your reversal, you pointed out that there are "reliable sources" in the article.

That's true, but my reading of the criteria on speedy deletion seems to require not only reliable-source citations, but also requires significance (or notability).

"This applies to any article...that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.... This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources ... The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible." Criteria_for_speedy_deletion (emphasis mine)

While there are indeed citations, in cleaning up the article, it became clear that the claim of significance or importance is not credible. The only significance of the subject I was able to verify through citations was winning a middle-school science fair, having a photo taken for a poster, and having a common genetic disease.

I'd request you replace the speedy deletion template. If you don't agree, I'm happy to go through the WP:AFD process. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerri9494 (talk • contribs)
 * (Discussion continued at Articles for deletion/Rachel Chaikof.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please Block ip vandal
Please block vandal ip address 219.78.77.203 has repeatedly vandalised the Hakkas wikipage by going against WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES. Hakkameizhow (talk) 04:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Noting that Hakkameizhow has shopped this request around. This IP may eventually need a disruption block, but Hakkameizhow has failed to warn or inform the IP editor of the MOS issue and inappropriately reverts it as vandalism. See my talk for more. -- ferret (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter
 Baffle☿gab  03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Peepeepoopoo
Hey Reaper--you make filters? Please see my block log; it seems to me that these two are the same person, using proxies or whatever. I don't know how they got to create accounts with those names, but it'd be great if they could be stopped. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know if it's the same dick that messing with History of Burnley F.C. but it might as well be. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Because accounts are no longer created locally, MediaWiki:Titleblacklist can no longer be used to stop clearly-inappropriate usernames. Only the global title blacklist at meta can stop them. I'm not convinced these accounts are related, since "pee", "420", "69", and "poo" are just common schoolyard vandalism names. That said, they're obviously not here to be constructive. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

GA review of Symphyotrichum kentuckiense
Hi, Reaper! I hope you are okay. It's been ten days since I've heard from you, and the review of Symphyotrichum kentuckiense is waiting on you. I have completed everything we discussed thus far and made changes you requested. When do you think you will have time to look at that again? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I just got back from another (!) business trip. I should have time tomorrow to complete the review. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for finishing up the review and being so thorough! I appreciate what you do! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your voting guide
Hi Reaper, just wanted to let you know that your ACE guide isn't currently showing in Template:ACE2022 – if you had intended to show it there, it needs to be added manually.

Thanks for the kind words in your guide nonetheless – much appreciated

KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 07:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You're welcome; thanks for being willing to do this job! I'm personally unsure whether I should add it. Ultimately, a voter guide like mine is more to explain my thoughts and reasons for my votes. It is in the category so people can dig for it if they wish, but it isn't front-and-center like it would be if added to the template. Ironically, I don't think I've ever personally added my guides to the template, though other people have in the past. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error
The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Reaper Eternal!


Happy New Year! Reaper Eternal, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 March 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Thoughts
Hey Brian, just wanted to let you know that I partially reverted your edits here: Special:Diff/1169027893. I reintroduced the paragraph but in a less aggressive tone, I think primarily we should separate the concerns of a clerk vs. patrolling admin, i.e. it is definitely possible for a patrolling admin to clerk effectively but also the other way around, and if not, that is a problem, as it creates more work for the limited number of clerks. <span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',Geneva,sans-serif"> qedk ( t  愛  c ) 16:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)