User talk:Reasoft

ReaSoft PDF Printer
Another editor has added the  template to the article ReaSoft PDF Printer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Illustration.png
Thanks for uploading Illustration.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Recent Article on Reasoft Firewall
The above article which you recently created may be seen as self-promotion and or COI. I suggest trying to rewrite the article to be more neutral before someone tags it for deletion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ReaConverter
A tag has been placed on ReaConverter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tan  |   39  05:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Spam in ReaJPEG
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ReaJPEG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ReaJPEG is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ReaJPEG, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Multispam
You have chosen to ignore Wikipedia policy on advertising, so I have taken some action to limit your activities. I've blocked your username indefinitely as spam itself, but I have not stopped you creating a new account under a different name. Be aware that continued spamming may lead to a block on editing and on creating a new account. I've also deleted all the spam articles Ii can find. Jimfbleak (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)