User talk:Rebecca5802/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating? (Provide a link to the article here.) Mikhail Zhvanetsky Mikhail_Zhvanetsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebecca5802 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate? (Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I wanted to learn more about comedy, and then I clicked on Jewish Comedy, and then I found Mikhail Zhvanetsky and I know that my parents like him so I wanted to learn more about him.

Evaluate the article (Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) The lead has a good introductory sentence. It explains who Zhvanetsky is and what he is known for. The lead is not overly detailed There is not a lot of content. It is relevant, however, it only says when and where he was born and the awards he won. There is a lot of missing information. The article is in a neutral point of view.

There are 5 good references. They are current, and they work. The article is clear and concise, however it is very short.

It does include a good image of him.

There are not a lot of comments in the talk page and the article is not rated.

The article's overall status is not very good because there is very little information. Rebecca5802 (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)