User talk:RebeccaLYU

Under the Dome (film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under_the_Dome_(film)

'''THIS IS MY FIRST CHOICE. I will include news reports and comments on this film from Chinese sources. From these articles, I will find how the film affects people's perceptions over air pollution. '''

Potential improvements for this topic:
 * 1) Sources for this topic all came from western newspapers. It would be better to add some academic sources. What is more, this film is about the smog pollution in China. Therefore, it may be more reasonable to add sources from Chinese newspapers, media, and academic papers.
 * 2) The structure of this page is confusing and a bit 'chaotic'. For example, the contributor put government responses, public responses and impacts on market all in the Release section. Clearly, these three should be in different sections.

Potential references to add to:
 * 1) Under the Dome: The smog film taking China by storm， http://mrdivis.yolasite.com/resources/Under%20the%20Dome%20film.pdf
 * 2) Cui, S. (2017). 'Chai Jing's Under the Dome : A multimedia documentary in the digital age', Journal of Chinese Cinemas, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 30-45. Available from: 10.1080/17508061.2016.1269481.
 * 3) Jack Patrick Hayes; Under the Dome, Environmental History, Volume 22, Issue 2, 1 April 2017, Pages 345–348, https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emw111
 * 4) Powers, D. S. (2016). 'Under the dome' on chinese air pollution, a documentary by chai jing. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37(1), 98-106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2015.40

Still trying to find some sources from Chinese Newspapers. A bit hard because this documentary was banned 1 week after released.

RebeccaLYU (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Ofo (bike sharing)
Potential sources:


 * 1) OFO, https://www.ofo.com/
 * 2) Ofo comes to the US, joining the bike-share fray in Seattle, https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/16/ofo-comes-to-the-us-joining-the-bike-share-fray-in-seattle/
 * 3) 'Uber for bikes': Chinese firm eyes global dominion with launch in Manchester, https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jun/12/uber-bikes-manchester-mobike-china-global-ofo

RebeccaLYU (talk) 04:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Potential topics

 * 1) APEC blue. Not rated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APEC_blue
 * 2) RStudio (a platform for R coding). C-Low. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RStudio
 * 3) Wind power in China. C-Low. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_China

RebeccaLYU (talk) 14:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

APEC blue
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APEC_blue

'''SECONDARY OPTION. BUT I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO CREATE A NEW PAGE "PARADE BLUE", WHICH REFERS TO THE GOOD AIR QUALITY DURING THE VICTORY PARADE IN EARLY SEPTEMBER, 2015.'''


 * 1) “APEC Blue”: Secondary Aerosol Reductions from Emission Controls in Beijing. Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wild, O., Xu, W., Chen, C., Fu, P., ... & Wang, Q. (2016). “APEC Blue”: secondary aerosol reductions from emission controls in Beijing. Scientific reports, 6, 20668. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep20668?WT.feed_name=subjects_atmospheric-chemistry
 * 2) Meng, R., Zhao, F. R., Sun, K., Zhang, R., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2015). Analysis of the 2014 “APEC blue” in Beijing using more than one decade of satellite observations: lessons learned from radical emission control measures. Remote Sensing, 7(11), 15224-15243.
 * 3) Liu, H., Liu, C., Xie, Z., Li, Y., Huang, X., Wang, S., ... & Xie, P. (2016). A paradox for air pollution controlling in China revealed by “APEC Blue” and “Parade Blue”. Scientific reports, 6.
 * 1) Liu, H., Liu, C., Xie, Z., Li, Y., Huang, X., Wang, S., ... & Xie, P. (2016). A paradox for air pollution controlling in China revealed by “APEC Blue” and “Parade Blue”. Scientific reports, 6.
 * 1) Liu, H., Liu, C., Xie, Z., Li, Y., Huang, X., Wang, S., ... & Xie, P. (2016). A paradox for air pollution controlling in China revealed by “APEC Blue” and “Parade Blue”. Scientific reports, 6.

RebeccaLYU (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

I think "Under the Dome" is a great choice....
For your second point, reorganizing the responses, I would suggest creating a section called "Reactions" and then three subsections (Government reaction, etc.) as you have outlined. I look forward to seeing the Chinese perspectives you add! Eric WritingMan (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)