User talk:Rebecca jane williams

Welcome!
Hello, Rebecca jane williams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reference Errors on 12 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620877786 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F620877786%7CAccounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board%5D%5D Ask for help])

Hello!
Hello there, and thank you for your efforts on Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board! However, your focus on that article, as well as using the APESB's official site as sole reference, leads me to suspect that you might have a conflict of interest by Wikipedia's standards. While this is not necessarily a problem&mdash;from what I can tell, you've been careful to remain neutral and factual while editing, though it wouldn't hurt to include some independent sources&mdash;an editor with a seeming undisclosed conflict of interest generally attracts a lot of scrutiny on Wikipedia, both because it is very difficult to remain neutral about subjects you're involved with and because there are a lot of people who try to use Wikipedia as method of promotion (either because of a misunderstanding of Wikipedia's rules and principles or by knowingly acting in contradiction to them). As a result, the Wikipedian community has become somewhat wary of editors with a conflict of interest. It is generally speaking recommended and strongly appreciated (and if the conflict of interest is of a financial kind, even more-so) if an editor discloses having such a conflict of interest, because it shows, among other things, a willingness to "play within Wikipedia's rules", as to speak. If I have misread the situation and you do not have a conflict of interest, feel free to ignore this message. If you are uncertain whether you have a conflict of interest or not, feel free ask here or leave me a message on my talkpage and I'd gladly help you evaluate whether or not you do. (If you ask here and I do not respond within a day or so, please message me on my talkpage, because in that case, I likely haven't seen the message) Or, if you'd rather not approach me, you could ask on for example the Teahouse, the Helpdesk or the Conflict of Interest Noteboard. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)