User talk:Rebekahalnablack

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- MightyWarrior (talk) 09:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

New articles
When creating an article, you may wish to start it outside the main article space; for example, clicking on User:Rebekahalnablack/New_article will create an article in your 'user' area. When the article is of a significant size (and therefore less likely to be deleted), you can use the "Move" button to move it to the main article space. See Your first article, especially How to create a page. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Case no. 16CV300


The article Case no. 16CV300 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The court proceedings of a small court do not merit there own articles unless they have greater significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Case no. 16CV300 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Case no. 16CV300 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Case no. 16CV300 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 16:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Case no. 16CV300— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 23:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

cpt i cant understnd pls restate

Speedy deletion nomination of Educational Service Workers


A tag has been placed on Educational Service Workers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 15:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright
You are not allowed to copy copyright-protected text from anywhere into Wikipedia; it does not matter whether the issue is important or not. Virtually any written text is copyright-protected; the only items you can copy are those which specifically state that they are free use; and of course anything for which you personally hold copyright, although even there it must be demonstrated; see WP:COPYRIGHT. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, so I say it in my own words and point to the news sources? Rebekahalnablack (talk) 17:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello and welcome
Hello. I came across your talk page after following some links from the Articles for Deletion pages. Looking at the notices above, I can see that you are trying to create an article concerning a subject you care about deeply. It is always frustrating for new users to read "Anyone can edit" as a promise from the site, and then be told over and over again that their edits are not wanted. That's not exactly what's happening, but I know that's what it feels like.

The basic issue is this: Wikipedia has, over the course of many discussions, reached two decisions that affect you personally: 1) People directly connected to an article's subject should not be the ones to make the biggest contributions to that article and 2) There need to be significant, independent, verifiable sources to each claim an article makes. There are good reasons for this site to have made those decisions, but they can easily feel discriminatory to those caught against them.

I suggest you might want to request another editor to create the article for you.
 * 1) Click This Link
 * 2) Hold down the Shift and Alt keys and hit the "E" key (this brings up the edit window)
 * 3) Scroll down (way down) until you see the "Education" section.
 * 4) Find a blank space under the "General" heading.
 * 5) Start a new request with a blank line.
 * 6) Type *  and replace "MISSING_ARTICLE_NAME" with the article name you think needs to be added. I suggest that you don't use the case number but rather the case name.  See, for example, Brown v. Board of Education or In the Matter of S---
 * 7) Add more information about what the the case is about, what the issue is, why it matters, how it relates to education, and whatever links about the case you can.
 * 8) Finish your posting by typing four tilde characters in a row to sign your post. Like this: ~
 * 9) Below the main text box is a smaller one that has the label "Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)".  Type something like: "requesting new article about ..."
 * 10) Click "Show Preview" to make sure it looks good.
 * 11) Scroll all the way back down to the bottom where you will see the edit window again.
 * 12) Make any changes necessary
 * 13) Click "Save Changes"

I can't guarantee that this will get your article created, but it may be your best shot.

Happy New Year Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok! I did it! Thanks again! :) Rebekahalnablack (talk) 23:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh wow ! This is super helpful! I was thinking about this.. can you please check it out? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GA_Code_%C2%A7_34-8-196 oops forgot to sign, thx! Rebekahalnablack (talk) 17:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That article at least has references, but it resembles what we call a coat rack article. That is the title is about one thing (a provision in Georgia state law) but all the text is about something else (compensation for education workers).  Sorry to say, it may very well also be deleted.  Best of luck Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * hmmm, I see... It is weird how that provision in state law is all about compensation for educational service workers.. maybe I should just call the article something less formal like "Compensation for education service workers in Georgia" ? I never knew how much history and news coverage a state law could get! :) Rebekahalnablack (talk) 17:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That might be a good place to start. I might also suggest that you try checking out the Teahouse, a place on the project specifically dedicated to helping new users get on their feet. I'll add a message below with a link about it. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, well, I couldn't get that to work, but try This link anyway. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Awesome! I will definitely be checking these things out! I like your ideas a lot and thx for sharing! Happy new year! Rebekahalnablack (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Code § 34-8-196
Hi. I see that you created GA Code § 34-8-196, which is essentially the same article as Case no. 16CV300. I have deleted it. You seem to be quite determined to create a wikipedia article on this topic. As I mentioned earlier, WP:COI states our policy regarding conflict of interest. You stated in Articles for deletion/Case no. 16CV300 that you are the plaintiff in this case, which is clearly a conflict of interest. Please do not create any more articles on this topic, or any related topic. You are welcome to continue to edit Wikipedia on other topics, but you should not recreate this article again, or any article on a closely related topic. If you continue to do so, you will be prevented from making any further edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoySmith (talk • contribs) 22:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I do apologize but there is no case involved in this article. This article is about the provisions of law in Georgia. It is not conflict of interest! Please reinstate it and actually read the new article, the other was of course totally premature! Rebekahalnablack (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)