User talk:Rebelmc

Image copyright problem with Image:Peter_conradi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peter_conradi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Poodlebug
A tag has been placed on Poodlebug, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Poodlebug
While I admit the "definition" of this word is quite entertaining to everyone except those that a poodlebug lands on (I laughed out loud), it does not belong in Wikipedia. Please read our guidelines in regards to recently created or coined terms. I've added a proposed deletion tag which gives the article 5 days to come up with better sources, read this guideline for help, if any can miraculously be found. FYI, blogs are not reliable sources. If you need any further assistance, please ask me on my talk page by clicking the 76 in my signature. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76  17:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)