User talk:Rebrane

Archived at User talk:Rebrane/Archive1

Speedy deletion of Template:Vain
A tag has been placed on Template:Vain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Adel al-Jubeir.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adel al-Jubeir.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 19:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:BacheletRumsfeld.jpg
File:BacheletRumsfeld.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:BacheletRumsfeld.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Sack tapping
You suggested this merge; but did not begin the discussion. Do you plan to follow through? If not, I'll revert the suggestion. TJRC (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks like "no," so I have reverted. TJRC (talk) 00:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of richest American politicians for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of richest American politicians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of richest American politicians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dezastru (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. When you recently edited Ryan Crocker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Cunningham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:American women novelists
So, do you want us to remove the contents of this category from Category:American women writers and Category:Women novelists, or do you want to upmerge to those parents as well, and just ignored those? Or do you want to only upmerge to one of those other parents, and not the other.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


 * We should make changes based on the consensus which emerges from the CfD discussion. They'll probably have a bot do the work. neilk (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

neilk
Hi. There's a User:NeilK (he used work for the Wikimedia Foundation). Your signature may confuse people a bit. I happened to notice it in the context of this monster. Just thought you'd like a heads-up as seeing it made me do a double take. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uncle Louie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Customs and Border Protection ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Uncle_Louie check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Uncle_Louie?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)