User talk:Rebroad/Archive 2017

Please read this carefully
Doug Weller talk 11:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this, although I am at a loss as to what has prompted you to post this. --Rebroad (talk) 08:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It might not be necessary, but this edit suggested it might be useful. I'm at a loss myself why a long time editor, here longer than me, would post to a help page for newbies - that could be seen as canvassing. Doug Weller  talk 09:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I followed the links for HELP from the main Wikipedia page. I was also confused when it mentioned the page was for newbies, with no links to alternative help pages. --Rebroad (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I see. The first link in that sentence is WP:Help Desk, something I still use. Still, maybe there should be a link for help if you have a dispute with someone. Doug Weller  talk 15:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to David Irving. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No idea what you are talking about - I was removing non-NPOV material, not adding any! --Rebroad (talk) 08:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Rebroad, you seem to be making very provocative edits at David Irving and Holocaust denial. Your changes are controversial in nature, so it would be appropriate to discuss them on the talk page first. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 08:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have added explanation to the article talk page. Thank you for your concerns, and sorry to hear you are feeling provoked. It is not my intention to provoke but I realise this is an emotional subject for many, so thank you for being willing to communicate your concerns so far. --Rebroad (talk) 08:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not personally provoked, Rebroad, just irritated. You are making very controversial edits at two articles on very controversial subjects, and you can expect me or someone else to revert them soon. I have enough experience of Wikipedia to be very confident that you will not be able to get your changes accepted at either article, and since you have been editing for even longer than I have, so should you. I respectfully suggest you find a better use for your time on Wikipedia. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 08:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Holocaust denial. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Since per your edit summary you are obviously aware of the existence of the 3RR, this is your reminder that the three-revert rule is not an entitlement, and edit warring is prohibited regardless of edit count. VQuakr (talk) 08:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Just in case not everything was covered above, there may be more here.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your edits at the Rape and Sexual assault articles
Keep up the WP:Disruptive editing, and I will be reporting you at WP:ANI. You already showed that you should not be editing Wikipedia when you tried the stuff you tried at the Pedophilia article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)