User talk:Rec026

May 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wild horse with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Logos. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Logos was changed by Rec026 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936105 on 2016-05-22T05:55:57+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cloak, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cloak was changed by Rec026 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965752 on 2016-05-22T06:11:00+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)