User talk:Reccmo

Welcome!
Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

A few tips before you start doing a lot of editing:


 * A few basic rules: Try to write from a neutral point of view, be bold in editing pages, and use Wikiquette.


 * A handy page for newcomers is the welcome page. The Wikipedia tutorial also gives a lot of basic info that will help get you oriented on Wikipedia. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or Where to ask a question.


 * When you post something on a talk/discussion page, you can sign your name by using three tildes ( " ") for your username and four (" ~ ") for your username and a timestamp.


 * Remember to provide an edit summary when editing.


 * If you ever find yourself with nothing to do on Wikipedia, have a look at the Community Portal, you'll find that there's always something happening.

If you have any questions, comments, or just want to say hi, don't hesitate to write to me on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can.

Happy editing! :-) Akamad Happy new year! 11:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Werner Icking Music Archive
What is it about the WIMA that all you do is add external links to it into several articles? It would be nice if you write an article about it first. I hope this is not just a way to advertise the site. -- Perfecto 22:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. -- Perfecto 22:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I have no need for advertising WIMA which is strictly non-commercial, just try a Google search on "Werner Icking Music Archive" to see why. My aim is simply to improve the Wikipedia articles on composers by adding links to freely available, mostly high quality scores by those composers. I'll consider adding an article on WIMA.

Christian Mondrup

PS See my New User log

Reccmo 23:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Isn't it sufficient with the entry on WIMA I added several weeks ago to the external links section of the Wikipedia article on Sheet music?

Reccmo 23:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Not exactly. Wikipedia is not a collection of external links.  What you do is seeding Wikipedia articles with external links to a website you maintain, and it's not our exact intention.  See External links.


 * RE: "freely available". I found it hard also to assess whether your data is free content.  You say free now, yet I've seen nothing on the site saying "free forever".  In other words, when the site gets bought, and the new owner started charging, she potentially has hundreds of links from Wikipedia in place. -- Perfecto  15:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

1. See the article on the Werner Icking Music Archive I entered earlier today. Unless you claim I'm lying that article should present evidence of the public domain nature of WIMA. WIMA can't possibly be bought by anybody because the site is hosted by a Danish state owned cultural organization, The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus.

2. Tell me why external links to music in similar public domain libraries like CPDL and Mutopia that existed before I added links to WIMA are not offensive! I am cooperating closely with the editors of these archives. If you believe I'm lying then ask these editors!

Reccmo 15:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The links I've been adding are all referring to freely available, public domain music by the composers in concern. Take as an example the article on Johann Sebastian Bach. The external link to WIMA is to a web index of music solely by this composer. That's how WIMA is structured.

Reccmo 16:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

For a presentation of the WIMA publishing and usage conditions see the introductory page, http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/Introduction.html

Reccmo 16:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

As you'll notice from the editing history of the article on Michael Praetorius the author of the inital article (user Camenbert) added an external link to the WIMA Michael Praetorius web index.

Reccmo 17:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * OK. Thank you for clarifying this with me. -- Perfecto 18:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WIMA
Template:WIMA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

It's fine for me to phase out the template WIMA provided references to the non maintained but still existing site WIMA are replaced with references to the corresponding IMSLP pages through the IMSLP template

Reccmo (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mup music publication program
Hello, Reccmo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mup music publication program, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Velella  Velella Talk 10:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mup (July 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mup Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:1997kB&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mup reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mup (July 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mup Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mup reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 07:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jennifer I. Paull.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer I. Paull.jpg, which you've attributed to ticket 2018072310008055, which does not contain acceptable evidence of permission. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)