User talk:Reciprocater

Reciprocater, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * Thank you for the kind greetings! ^__^ --Reciprocater (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TSMC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFM ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/TSMC check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/TSMC?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Identifying literature review, systematic review and peer review.
Hi, could you help me identify if the following source is a literature review or simply a peer reviewed primary source? Thank you.



--Reciprocater (talk) 13:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Is your script able to differentiate between literature review and a peer reviewed primary source? Thanks. --Reciprocater (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Nope. And I really don't see how a script even could. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you.--Reciprocater (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Reciprocater. You asked for advice in finding systematic reviews on PubMed. Here is the link, offering two methods, or a third is to simply enter 'review' as a search word separated by a space with other search terms of interest. Example: this search was for ['systematic review ace II']. 1) Assure the publication is indexed by Medline by clicking on the journal title and checking that it is indexed, such as this example (BMC MG is). Your next step is to assess date and journal quality. 2) See WP:MEDDATE to select a review from within the last 5 years. 3) Check WP:CITEWATCH to eliminate a journal if potentially predatory or if it comes from the alternative medicine literature. 4) Check the impact factor with a Google search of the journal title and 'impact factor' as a search term, example here where the impact factor is above 1.0 (which is low, but adequate, for medical sources). The higher number for impact factor, the better. See here. Fyi: The review you chose above in Cardiovascular Research looks ok, except that it is 13 years out of date. Good luck! --Zefr (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much!! Now I know that's how it is! --Reciprocater (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * A note about WP:CITEWATCH, it only reports what is currently cited on Wikipedia (well, technically, what is cited as of the last WP:DUMP, which can be seen at the bottom of the WP:CITEWATCH page). WP:CITEWATCH/SETUP has a longer list of problematic citations. The easiest workflow for checking if a journal is nonsense is to check against https://beallslist.net/ (both the publisher and journal, by name and by url domain), and the other lists at WP:CITEWATCH/SETUP. I try to put as many as possible of those in my script, but it doesn't cover everything. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your informative reminder! --Reciprocater (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Go here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17049503 click on publication type. It says "review". That means it is a review article not just peer reviewed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I was somewhat confused. Reciprocater (talk) 16:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Backup from User talk:Zefr： Human coronavirus NL63
Human coronavirus NL63: The infecting virus is an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus which enters its host cell by the ACE2 receptor. I saw ACE2 receptor had been redirected to Angiotensin_II_receptor. Is it a correct redirection? Regards, --Reciprocater (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * - I think you have it right here, but I am not an expert on this topic. A good place to get broad expert feedback on such a question is WT:MED. --Zefr (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Reciprocater (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Reciprocater

Thank you for creating New Taiwanese Dollar.

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the knowledge you've imparted! It looks novel to me! I will try! --Reciprocater (Talk) 17:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silent chest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agitation ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Silent_chest check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Silent_chest?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Signature
Here is a variant of your sig that is hopefully less distracting:

This shows the appearances of the two versions side by side:
 * Original:  --Reciprocater (Talk)         Variant:   --Reciprocater (Talk)

--Lambiam 16:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh! Thank you so much!! This is gorgeous! I like it! :D --Reciprocater (Talk) 17:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Woerich. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mainland China without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Woerich   (talk)   18:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh! I had. Probably because there was a time lags. I politely invite you to check again. Thank you so much! --Reciprocater (Talk) 18:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your slash-and-burn approach to sourcing is wholly unacceptable and a form of WP:TE. Nowhere in WP:SOURCE is there a requirement for the subject of a source cited in a Wikipedia article to be strictly about the article topic in question. And, yes, contrary to your dictat, a Legislative Council of Hong Kong document is absolutely a reliable primary source documenting usage of the term within that territory. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 04:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:Primary source goes to WP:OR. Stop WP:GAME!--Reciprocater (Talk) 04:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I should have said "documenting official usage", though you will dispense with the facetious WP:GAME accusation immediately, per WP:NPA. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 04:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:GAME:Gaming the system may include:Wikilawyering, pettifogging, and otherwise using the letter of policy to violate the broader principles of the policy. which appears to match your behavior that redirected WP:primary source to WP:RS. But since you've taken a step back saying "should have", I think I am not going to say Game. Wiped! Reciprocater (Talk) 04:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 21, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Greater China
Please don't revert my good faith edit, just leave the job to the native editors please. The original infobox was perfect, Da/Tai can mean great or big in Chinese. In this context, 大中华 (da zhonghua) is the perfect translation. Just insert Tai makes no sense at all, it is just pure spam by Google Translate. I am native Chinese speaker, I know the subtle difference in a Chinese phrase.

Thank you for your cooperation. 2001:8003:9008:1301:780A:CF5:F4B:EC87 (talk) 04:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your clarification. But Wikipedia relies on WP:RS to work. Just because claiming yourself is a native Chinese Speaker is insufficient. --Reciprocater (Talk)

April 2020
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/It's gonna be awesome. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Since you insist on wasting our time further, WP:ANI. If you have any statement you want to make, post it here and someone will copy it across if appropriate. &#8209; Iridescent 12:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Since you insist on wasting our time further, WP:ANI. If you have any statement you want to make, post it here and someone will copy it across if appropriate. &#8209; Iridescent 12:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)