User talk:Reconcilian

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Friedmann, E


A tag has been placed on Daniel Friedmann, E requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toccata quarta (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing
Hello, I'm Jytdog. I noticed that you made changes to an article, Creationism, but you didn't provide any reliable sources. Your edits have been removed and are archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 05:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Please also read WP:UNDUE. What sources meeting WP:RS discuss him. Another point is that I see no evidence he meets our criteria at RS or WP: VERIFY. How can you show that his books are reliably published? Doug Weller  talk 05:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Are you Daniel Friedmann or in any way connected to him?
You appear to be what we call a single purpose editor here to promote Friedmann, so I have to ask whether you have any relationship to him. I hope that you will respond. Doug Weller talk 09:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)