User talk:Rectum destroyer


 * I have explained the situation here already - my edits were made in humour, and were not intended to be what you guys have taken it to be, and you can clearly see from my replies i am capable of making constructive edits on Wikipedia. Rectum destroyer 10:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * But an indefinite block? think about it. Rectum destroyer 15:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Your silence speaks a million words mate. Rectum destroyer 15:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Why not block you forever? We won't be losing any valuable or useful contributions, after all, and we'll be preventing  further vandalism.  Seems smart to me.  Would you like me to shut down this page, too?  I'd be happy to. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Making sweeping statements like "We won't be losing any valuable or useful contributions", is a bit lame isn't it? you don't know me at all, infact all you do know of me is about 5 posts i made under the name "rectum_destroyer" which were all played with comedy effect (regardless if you found them funny or not), and as for "shutting down" this page - if you REALLY want to you can go ahead i suppose, but you are quite clearly showing some form of "Moderator" ego by making that statement. Well done btw. Rectum destroyer 08:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocking
You may wish to consider Usernames in addition to your history of edits. DuncanHill 15:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The username as well as the edits were part of the gimmick. Rectum destroyer 16:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)