User talk:Recury/Archive/2007

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from Hurrmic
I need to pay more attention to what I'm doing. I'm having fun learning to edit, but I don't have anywhere near enough time to devote to it. By the way, I'm a NASCAR fan, so I'll be joining that project, too. R.I.P. Bobby Hamilton. Hurrmic 21:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I Heart Huckabees
There is a new debate on the name change at Talk:I ♥ Huckabees Bssc81 19:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Death of Dale Earnhardt
Are you sure that you want to withdraw your nomination to delete the 2 old articles? Don't you want the 2 articles deleted since they have been merged into something much better? RoyalbroilT : C 19:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

"notability" reverts
Please consider actually going to the talk page rather than blindly reverting to versions without consensus. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ChesterJetsLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ChesterJetsLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GuildfordHeatLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:GuildfordHeatLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WestfieldSharksLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:WestfieldSharksLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Timothy Noah
Timothy Noah wrote an article at Slate.com about how his Wiki article had been nominated for deletion... when, in fact, it had not. He then went on a tear about Wikipedia's notability policies. He's clearly notable, as he's published a book, is a senior Slate columnist, and is interviewed and quoted in various newspapers and other media. I've closed the AfD again. JDoorjam    JDiscourse 00:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Redirects for deletion
I didn't even know that that was a separate category, or I would have nominated it there; wow. OverMyHead 15:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Tony45844
Thanks for keeping an eye on his page, like reverting his removal of the warning. But please sign your posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~ ). He thought it was me when you were leaving your comments. Leebo T / C  16:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Another Notability Debate
I imagine you'd have something to say about Articles_for_deletion/Menachem_Z._Rosensaft, given your position on Timothy Noah.
 * Nope! Recury 23:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for more Daytona pics!
We've really been making headway recently. It's helped that the weather has been cooperating spectacularly; gods but the last few weekends have been gorgeomous. You've been hitting Daytona Beach, other folks are getting Lee County and Brevard County, and I covered a good portion of Lake County this week. I think we may actually have pics for every registered historic place in Florida in the foreseeable future. Who'd'a thunk? Gracias again, and keep up the good work.
 * SIDENOTE: You might wanna consider archiving this page. I broke down finally and got one of the bots that does it automatically to do mine. Check User:MiszaBot III, if you're interested. :) --Ebyabe 13:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to see how big I can get it (apologies if you're on 56k or something). I'm surprised it took this long for anyone to say anything. Recury 13:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_2
My watchlist is full of changes to the articles of members of racing families of many genres. The CfD resulted in delete. A bot took them all out the NASCAR subcategory and put them in no NASCAR category. Would you fix the mess? RoyalbroilT : C 17:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think this really messes us up any. They should have been in the family categories in addition to some other NASCAR category (drivers, owners, etc.) If you know of specific articles that aren't in any, let me know and I can find a place for them. Recury 22:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I notice that Bill France, Jr. isn't in a NASCAR category. RoyalbroilT : C 01:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Florida Photographic Collection
I want to make sure that you read the post on the WikiProject NASCAR talk page about the category for the collection on Commons has been up for deletion since March 25th. Please inform your Florida friends. You can reply on WP:NASCAR if you feel the urge.

You should archive some time. I was a newbie when you archived it last. Royal</b><b style="color:#FFCC00;">broil</b>T : C 01:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Québécois
Hello, I am contacting all non-anonymous editors who participated in the debate at Articles for deletion/Québécois. It has been very difficult achieving consensus on the appropriate scope of the article, and the use of the word Québécois in a series of articles proposed by one editor. I am requesting input at Talk:Québécois. Joeldl 23:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 02:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Mario Andretti
I am working with User:4u1e to develop the article for one of my racing idols Mario Andretti to "Good Article" status for WikiProject Motorsport. I hope to develop it to "Feature Article" some day. Would you critically review the article? Please give us feedback on the entire article, and in particular, areas that we have identified as weak: the introduction and the overall structure of the article (particularly the time in his life where he "racing in several series"). Let's use the talk page for the article for discussion. Thanks! Royal broil 12:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MassiveAttack-GroupFour.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:MassiveAttack-GroupFour.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:MassiveAttack-UnfinishedSympathy.ogg
I have tagged Image:MassiveAttack-UnfinishedSympathy.ogg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NASCAR logo.png
Hello Recury, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:NASCAR logo.png) was found at the following location: User:Recury/NASCAR Temp. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Article up for AfD
You may be interested: David MacMichael one of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity is up for deletion. 68.91.252.148 18:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MiltonKeynesLionsLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:MiltonKeynesLionsLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ScottishRocksLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ScottishRocksLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NewcastleEaglesLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:NewcastleEaglesLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LeicesterRidersLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:LeicesterRidersLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PlymouthRaidersLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:PlymouthRaidersLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Apropos RSX
Why do you keep removing this information about RSX? Sorry, but it's kind of ridiculous. You say "that kind of info goes in the article itself". No, that's wrong. Just look at a few other disambiguation pages - ABA, Ala, Ale (disambiguation) ... need some more examples? When somebody looks up an acronym like this, it's without any doubt information that belongs here. So why exactly did you remove the following: RSX, acronym conceived by Dan Brevik (orig. meaning Real-Time System Executive, then ''Resource Sharing) 217.236.251.223 19:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with you putting what it stands for, but putting what it stands for, what it used to stand for and who came up with the term is overkill. Read WP:DABMOS for info about style on disambiguation pages. You link to the article and you say what the subject of the article is. That's it. Recury 20:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's remove who came up with the term. Referring to operating systems, there are only those two meanings (as far as I know).
 * And it's not only info for the RSX-11 article - the acronym was actually conceived for the forerunner RSX-15. Well, I had already added a quote telling this to the RSX-11 article. The first one I just tried - BMW, well then BMW (disambiguation) does NOT just "link and that's it". It says Bayerische ...
 * 217.236.247.8 21:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * PS I still think though, it would be best to include this info in the RSX-11 line; you wouldn't mind, if some of this "a family of operating systems developed by Digital Equipment Corporation" was deleted?


 * Well, this is really getting ridiculous; you turned these entries
 * RSX-11, operating system family (orig. meaning Real-Time System Executive, then Resource Sharing Executive)
 * Acura RSX, a sport compact/hatchback car made by Acura (i.e. Rally Sport eXperimental)
 * into these entries
 * RSX-11, a family of operating systems developed by Digital Equipment Corporation
 * Acura RSX, a sport compact/hatchback car made by Acura
 * and I bet you won't find many who think that was a smart change. The entries are NOT to long - and OTHER disambiguation pages say what acronyms stand for, too. Thus it's not very logical you don't change those, but act like a sentinel for the holy grail like RSX page.
 * I don't want to waste more time in this ridiculous edit-war. I just hope you don't take a fancy in changing the German article with that info that I will enter in a second.
 * 217.236.232.115 19:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Racing videos
I uploaded a short video to the Figure 8 racing article to demonstrate the crossover in the center of the 8 in the unusual racing genre. Do you think that it would be helpful to upload a short (around 45 second) video of a recent late model race at notable racetracks to show what it is like to attend weekly races at the track? One is a green-white-checkered restart at Wisconsin International Raceway, and it follows the winner Kyle Busch. You can see the video on my youtube account here. Another video there is occasional Busch Series starter Lowell Bennett winning the 2007 Slinger Nationals at Slinger Super Speedway. Do videos like these help the reader understand the track better: using big words "Pertinence and encyclopedicity" (from WP:IMAGE)? Please respond here on your talk page. Royal broil 09:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I can't watch your video because YouTube is blocked on this computer but I think in general a short video of a race at a track would be good for an article. The real question is about copyright. I know some tracks and series are really strict about this kind of thing, but the ones you mention would be OK I would think. If you have a program or a ticket stub from there, it probably talks about whether you need some kind of permission on there somewhere. Recury 13:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, so you agree that it is pertinent and encyclopedic. You can watch a sample video that I uploaded in the Figure 8 racing article - that's exactly what I'm talking about. You bring up a good point about the legality. Do you know where in Wikipedia I could ask about the legality - is there a place to ask legality questions? The ticket stubs have nothing on them - they are very generic. I will check out the track websites too. I could email the track asking for permission too. I talked with the owner of Wisconsin International Raceway when I helped the event sponsor with the national anthem in June, and he remembered me from doing the national anthem last year too. I have a contact who does marketing for a late model driver at Slinger Super Speedway who helps market the track too. Royal broil  17:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This page looks helpful. Recury 18:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Recury!
I have taken the liberty of editing your userpage.
 * You certainly have! Recury 14:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Auto racing terms and Category:NASCAR terms are up for renaming
It is proposed that they are renamed to Category:Auto racing terminology, Category:NASCAR terminology. Please join the discussion since you started both categories.

Also, please read How to archive a talk page. Ok, now I'm teasing you and giving you a hard time. 171k is the largest talk page that I've ever seen. Royal broil 21:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Recury 02:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Possible downgrading of A1 GP WikiProject to Taskforce status
Several users have started a conversation at WP:MOTOR about the possible downgrading of the A1 GP WikiProject to taskforce staus. I have notified you because your name is on the A1 GP Members list. The discussion is ongoing, and is located here. Davnel03 18:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 04:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px">

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Fart
Hello. I noticed that you've twice redirected Fart to Flatulence. There is no consensus for such a change and so your actions have twice been undone by different editors (the second one being me). I was going to inform you of the discussion at Articles for deletion/Fart but, on re-reading it, I see that you in fact participated. Your preferred option was not supported. Acting unilaterally in the way you have now done to implement the change you want when you have seen that it's not the consensus viewpoint is not terribly constructive, and it probably would be best not to carry on. Regards, BencherliteTalk 19:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * There is plenty of support on the talk page for a redirect. The deletion debate was about deletion, not redirecting. Recury 19:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 19:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Can't say I see the support here or here, and there's no discussion since then, apart from at the AfD. Speaking of which, I note that you in fact commented in favour of redirection in that discussion, so it's a bit odd to say now "The deletion debate was about deletion, not redirecting." Your change has been undone by a third editor. If you want to try to get consensus for your redirect, discuss on the talk page please. BencherliteTalk 19:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If you or any of the other editors would like to get WP:REDIRECT or WP:WINAD changed to support your position, you are welcome to try, but until then, Wikipedia is not a democracy and votes are not terribly helpful in cut-and-dry situations like this. Recury 20:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Due to consensus, as noted by Bencherlite, this is a cut and dry do not redirect. New and different consensus will be necessary, in my view for such a redirect to be appropriate. Furthermore, you have reverted 3 times in a 24 hour period on this issue. Please try another route.  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 20:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

3RR report
As you've continued with your contested redirect, making the same edit 5 times in just over one hour, despite three different editors taking issue with you, I've reported this to the 3RR noticeboard at Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR. Regards, BencherliteTalk 20:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked for 24 hours for violation of the three revert rule. Please take care to avoid this in the future.  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 20:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px">

Automatically delivered by COBot 02:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Alan Kulwicki
I have request a peer review for the Alan Kulwicki article (Peer review/Alan Kulwicki/archive1). Several people have reviewed the article, and I have implemented only the easiest problems so far. I would appreciate your input. btw, I laugh every time I read your user page! Royal broil 13:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Warnings as minor edits?
Thanks for notifying me about this, I didn't know why people weren't getting the new message bar. This has been fixed now. Brandon 23:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Brendon Small WP Entry
Ha! I burst out laughing right in the middle of my office after I made revisions to the page and saw your edit a while back. You were right.... it was an insulting typo ("small genitals")! Parasane (talk) 15:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)