User talk:RedBarchetta2112

Unexplained removals
I have reverted your unexplained removal of sourced and relevant material related to California wildfires. If you believe the material is not relevant, please explain why on the article talk page, and then gain consensus for your proposed changes. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at AR-15 style rifle, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

El_C 15:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I can't help but think you are not here to edit neutrally. Even if you were, all these unexplained removals and edits are disruptive. I will leave a warning or two below, in case you need proof that these are highly contentious areas. I have also reverted your edits to these coal plants--your removal of the link to Global warming may have validity to it, but you need to explain what you are doing, and in this case you should probably engage other editors on the talk page, in particular User:Lklundin, who seems to know a thing or two about science. (Surely you are not going to say "coal plants aren't relevant to global warming"--you might say "this link isn't relevant to this article", but that also needs to be argued, with an eye on what Wikipedia is and how it works. See also SEEALSO.) Drmies (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , you beat me to it--thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. You clearly have no intention of neutrality either, as your page openly indicates that you are in fact an ardent gun control advocate and it is abundantly clear that you indeed have an agenda you are pushing under the guise of neutrality. Clearly you have chosen to attack and revert anything I say out of personal spite and nothing else. Perhaps you should have a read about Narcissistic personality disorder and take a look in the mirror. If I added links pushing a left-wing viewpoint we both know you would look the other way.