User talk:Red King 0905

May 2021
Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Operation Barbarossa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 13:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Operation Barbarossa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 16:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Please stop your disruptive article of this article's infobox. If you want to add random generals, please discuss this on the talk page. Nick-D (talk) 10:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Toulon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Phipps. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Rapid mass edits
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. In particular, take a look at WP:MEATBOT. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liu Bei's takeover of Yi Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liu Zhang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Waterloo. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 11:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * To make this clear. You keep trying to add minor people to the infobox at this, and other articles. Despite being reverted, you continue to do this. You've never posted to an article's talk page, or to a user talk page. I strongly suggest you start listening and start communincating. FDW777 (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Commanders in infoboxes
Welcome to Wikipedia. With regards to military campaigns and battles you keep adding persons in the infoboxes who were either not prominent at the time (for instance persons who later became admirals but who at the time of the battle in question were merely lieutenants or captains) or were not in command during the battle or campaign (for instance generals commanding subordinate units in the battle (regiments, brigades, divisions, and so on). Please refrain from adding those minor commanders or officers in the infoboxes of battles and campaigns. You're overloading the infoxboxes. The consensus is that only the respective army commanders or those having a very prominent role during the battle by having commanded the field (for instance before the arrival of the army commander: examples are the role of Lannes at Friedland, or Reynolds and Hancock at Gettysburg) or those having an independent command (for instance alliances) should be added to the infobox. Those minor military figures, regardless of how prominent they later in life became, have no place in those infoboxes. Fair warning: such edits will and have been reverted by myself and other editors. I would thus kindly ask you to adhere to the aforementioned consensus with regards to infoboxes. -- fdewaele, 22 June 2021, 10:24 CET.


 * Stop this and start communicating, or I'll make a report at WP:ANI. You choose. FDW777 (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

If I need any help then I communicate with you Red King 0905 (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Short descriptions
With this edit, why did you capitalize "Lieutenant"? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I have reverted a number of your short descriptions. Nearly every one has a grammar error of some type, often upper case letters at the beginning of words that are not proper nouns. Thank you for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You are continuing to add misspelled short descriptions to articles. Please respond. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * With this edit you added the short description, "Spanish General", to Pedro Velarde y Santillán. You capitalized the first letter of "general", though it is not a proper noun in this context.  Moreover, there is nothing in the article suggesting this person ever achieved the rank of general.  Please respond. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)