User talk:Redactomètre

Bienvenu!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

I have somewhat amended the changes you recently made to the article for composer Benoît Charest. I have edited the information you have added so as to give it a more encyclopedic tone and I have re-introduced the information about his work/relationships with Maxime Morin and Béatrice Bonifassi -- this information was properly cited from reliable sources and it helps to establish Charest's notability, particularly to the mainly anglophone readership of the English version of Wikipedia who will arguably be more familiar with Morin and Bonifassi as they have both produced music played on English radio.

You have also added a lot of personal information about Mr Charest which is solely sourced from a Facebook page for the film Mars et Avril. This site does not truly count as a reliable source as per Wikipedia's guidelines as this site is not a source "with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." In recognition of the fact that a source was at least provided, and in the spirit of inclusionism/eventualism I have chosen to leave that information pretty much as-is, however there are editors who may decide to remove this information in the future — as per Wikipedia's edit policy: Unsourced (or poorly sourced) information may be challenged and removed, because on Wikipedia a lack of information is better than misleading or false information—Wikipedia's reputation as a trusted encyclopedia depends on the information in articles being verifiable and reliable.

I've also noted that someone has tried removing the information about Bonifassi and Morin on more than one occasion without explanation — I would hazard a guess (due to the username similarity) that you and User:Greenrectifier are one in the same; I suppose you might also be User:Studiofournaise and have perhaps worked with Charest...(?) Regardless, whenever you edit an article on Wikipedia, it is good practice to leave an edit summary explaining the reason for your changes, especially if you remove information that is cited from reliable sources. You might also consider first leaving a comment on the article's talk page to discuss changes prior to making them.

If by chance you are Benoit Charest you may want to consult the following link about dealing with articles about yourself.

You might consider looking at the following links:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page and I'll try to help you with what I can. You might also consider checking out Questions or you can also place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

S'il vous plaît noter également que je parle français, si vous souhaitez d'en discuter plus et se sentent plus à l'aise de converser dans cette langue.

Happy editing! --Marchije•speak/peek 00:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220  of  Borg 03:37, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Janice Nadeau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Red Ketchup) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Red Ketchup, Redactomètre!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Needs additional references for verification"

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

InsertCleverPhraseHere  22:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Réal Godbout copyright problem
Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from https://joeshusterawards.com/hof/real-godbout-1951/, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Imelda Trilogy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imelda Trilogy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Imelda Trilogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imelda Trilogy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)