User talk:Redban02

I will note that a CU on IRC has confirmed this is User:Redban and User:Percentagesign. Chillum 01:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Also Redban02, now that I see the Percentagesign account it seems you have not addressed the reason for the block escalation which is sock puppetry. Don't count on a change in duration or the standard offer until you address these concerns. Chillum 01:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

At the time, I thought the "retirement" tag meant I could open a new account without allegations of sockpuppetry. I didn't fully know the rules as yet. I don't have any other active accounts right now besides this one, and I hope I can edit solely from this one. Redban02 (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Absolutely not. Particularly since the rampant wikilawyering belies your protestations of innocent ignorance. postdlf (talk) 03:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Look postdlf. I'm willing to take a punishment. If you want to punish me, I'll take a 1-month, 3-month, 6-month ban,. But at least give me a shot to came back legitimately. Even people in real-life commit crimes yet get another chance after they serve their time in prison. If the law gives criminals another shot, then why deny me another shot in far less-serious venue? I think my position here is reasonable. Redban02 (talk) 03:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

NOTE to uninvolved administrators.

Postdlf posted this to admin PhilKnight's page upon my making this appeal:

''Ahem. Suggest reverting and blocking that account from editing their own talk page, as three lengthy unblock requests within a day and a half is rather beyond the pale. Incidentally, they've really gone out of their way to prove that the Redban "retirement" was in bad faith, as has been pretty much everything they've said and done under whatever account.'' Link

Postdlf is trying to break the rules outlined in "Guide to Appealing Blocks" by denying me an uninvolved admin's review. Instead of asking people to shut off the discussion, he needs to explain how an 11/15 success rate in AFDs qualified as disruptive. I want to stay civil, but I cannot understand how Postdlf became an adminstrator in the first place. Redban02 (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Relax. I'm not going to revoke your talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you Redban02 (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I expect you to accept by your next block review. You do not get unlimited unblock requests. If you make another unblock request after this I will revoke your talk page access for excess use of the unblock template. There are other people that need their blocks reviewed and you are taking a disproportionate amount of our time. Chillum 22:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)