User talk:RedcatsUSA

A tag has been placed on One stop plus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 21:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on OneStopPlus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 21:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Onestopplus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Onestopplus is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Onestopplus saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 22:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Plus size clothing
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. janejellyroll 21:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:OSPlus.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:OSPlus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Aril 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 22:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

OSP Response
Not sure where Wikipedia draws the line between stating the facts of a given website and accusing someone of advertising. A quick research on Wikipedia shows the following factual entries:

Retailers in the same industry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lane_Bryant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charming_Shoppes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hickey_Freeman

Other eCommerce Website entries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buy.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overstock

We would like to work with Wikipedia to fix our entry so that we can properly share some common knowledge as with other vendors have. RedcatsUSA 22:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedcatsUSA (talk • contribs)


 * From your choice of pronouns, it is obvious that you work for or otherwise represent the subject of the article in question. Wikipedia generally does not allow creation of an article by the subject of the article or by persons closely affiliated with the subject, as this generates a conflict of interest concern. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 22:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I have made an update to this entry and stating only factual statements about OneStopPlus. RedcatsUSA 22:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * There is also the concern of notability btw. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 22:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Will you be exercising the same thing to the said entries above?RedcatsUSA 22:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep in mind that as an editor, I'm expressing my concerns. An admin (or multiple admins) will make the actual decisions. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 22:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)