User talk:Reddi

If a rule prevents you from improving Wikipedia, ignore it. By all means break the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist ... Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry ... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.

Put new comments below Past discussion can be seen through the History page  =Responses=



So Long, and Thanks for all the comments

 * [replies here; sniping addressed ones; user responding to -  comments; most "quoted" comments are in italics]

=New criticism, comments, and feedback= From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; see history if you want the archive. J. D. Redding 22:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC) 

Proposed deletion of Telegeodynamics


The article Telegeodynamics has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTMIRROR / single primary source public domain source material, not a real thing. Also self promotion of one editors book."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

FAR notice
I have nominated Middle Ages for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)