User talk:Redfarmer

SVU seasons
Last time I checked, it was I who changed the infobox seasons, for the Monique Jeffries article - and my argument is not, I don't like it, as you'll read above, it's "what about the other seasons."? You'll point out that Jeffries only appeared in two seasons; which I'll then point out, what about Munch who has appeared in more than 2 seasons. By the way; Jeffries was a good article prior to the seasons in the infobox.

Now, also, you've moved our current discussion to your old talk page; do we continue there or here? -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 04:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to fight tooth and nail over linking seasons in infoboxes like you seem to be. My frustration comes from the fact I've run into you making unilateral contentious edits many times over the years. For instance, today you edit warred rather than actually ask me for reasoning if you didn't see the edit summary on John Munch. It's just the latest instance. Redfarmer (talk) 04:44, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? I'm not fighting over this - frankly, this is Wikipedia, and not anything to fight over. I'm frusturated as well, hence why I'm taking this issue to you. Explain to me, what you mean by, "I've run into you making unilateral contentious edits many times over the years" - I've never had contact with you, prior to this issue... what are you talking about? And let's not dwelve into edit warring, because I'm sure you've heard, it "takes two to tango". -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 04:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't deny I also engaged in edit warring. Doesn't make it right, but I'm frustrated. And yes, you have encountered me every time, each time reverting one of my edits controversially without discussion. I've been lurking as an ip for years and decided I might as well start using the account again. (And no, that doesn't make me a sockpuppet, like you once accused me of before.) Do what you want, I'm not going to sit here and engage in extended argument over two wiki links in an infobox. Redfarmer (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have never reverted people, without an edit summary, barring by accidence. I will make that one clear. If you could, can you provide me, with where I accuse you of sockpuppeting? If I did actually accuse you, apologies for that, but why not just edit out of an account? why not use edit summaries either? I mean, these things, help others understand what you're trying to do. Forget the two seasons things; I'll let someone else pick up on that... -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 05:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You accused me of being a sockpuppet (while editing as an ip) a while back on a discussion that I don't care to go back and find at the moment. I haven't been using an account because, up until now, most of my edits have been cursory. I've had very bad experiences on Wikipedia and wasn't sure if I'd ever come back permanently. I'm still not frankly, but I decided I wanted to recreate the Brian Cassidy article after someone did a good job of getting Monique Jeffries up to Good Article, and I need an account to get the photo up. And, frankly, edit summaries do very little when it seems like they're coming across as "this is how it is" commandments in place of discussion. Redfarmer (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Look, I have to suggest it. Can we just call things a truce? I mean, surprisingly enough, the second I saw your name re-appear I recognised it, and I was somewhat excited - because I personally, admire your work on the SVU related articles. Ever since people like you and User:AnmaFinotera left, the SVU area of Wikipedia has been more quiet, and things have been slower.
 * What I'm trying to say is, I work better - and I'd assume others do to - if we worked together, by communicating with eachother on what we are trying to do. We all want the same thing at the end of the day, and that's for Wikipedia to work out. I'm sorry, for whatever I had done in the past, that may have insulted you and or annoyed you; I do however look forward to working with you on Wikipedia, in particular with SVU related articles, because you seem really passionate about SVU articles - and whoever is passionate with SVU related articles, I get along with and enjoy working with! Apologies, --  MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 05:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Munch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Brian Cassidy
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tv.com show
Template:Tv.com show has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tv.com show
Template:Tv.com show has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Law & Order Season 19.jpg
Using this photo violates #2 criterion: never affecting commercial opportunities. This image is sold commercially, especially in NBCU Photo Bank (photo). Since then, I will upload the newer, cheaper screenshot of the cast soon, but it might omit one or more cast member, but it's better than using a highly-profitable photo. --George Ho (talk) 06:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If I am in error please correct it. This photo was uploaded a number of years ago when the image was publicly distributed on the L&O web site. Probably none of us were even aware of the existence of the NBC Universal Photo Bank back then. Redfarmer (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Another solution might be if you can get a screenshot of the three cops and the three prosecutors together. Redfarmer (talk) 15:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll upload an image soon, but I don't have an image of one chief (female/male) and one District Attorney together. You won't see an image of Steven Hill together with cops. --George Ho (talk) 15:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Law Order season nineteen.jpg, but it's poor quality. However, File:Law & Order Season 19.jpg is tagged for speedy deletion due to invalid fair use. If you have no objections against deletion, then I'll tag it with db-g7. Thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No objection. You seem to have done your research thoroughly. Thanks for taking the time to extend me the courtesy of a response, though. It's greatly appreciated! Redfarmer (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Law & Order Season 19.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Law & Order Season 19.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Subversive Records
Thanks for tagging this article for notability back in January 2008. I've looked it over but I'm not sure if it should be deleted. You might want to take it to the Notability Noticeboard or AfD to get it resolved once and for all. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review
Redfarmer, I just completed the GA review of Brian Cassidy; it's on hold for a week to give you time to address my feedback. Thought you'd like to know! Good luck. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above-mentioned week has come and gone, so I've had to fail this article. I see you haven't been around for awhile; hope you come back soon, and when you do, let me know how I can assist. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quarter Million Award
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

I see you're no longer very active, but I still wanted to leave this in thanks of all you've done for Wikipedia's readers. Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of August (pornographic actress)


The article August (pornographic actress) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails PORNBIO - no awards, only nominations - and the GNG. No reliably sourced biographical content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Law & Order UK Cast Photo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Law & Order UK Cast Photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HLOTS title.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:HLOTS title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:Redfarmer/UU Seminarian
User talk:Redfarmer/UU Seminarian, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Redfarmer/UU Seminarian and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Redfarmer/UU Seminarian during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:26, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Law & Order CI Season 8.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Law & Order CI Season 8.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dee (actress)


The article Dee (actress) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations (almost all scene-related). No nontrivial biographical content. No independent reliable sourcing for information regarding the article subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dee (actress) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dee (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dee (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 19:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TBJ Cast.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TBJ Cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

List of YouTubers
There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Newman (lifeguard) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Newman (lifeguard) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Newman (lifeguard) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Heart  (talk) 03:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)

July 28: You're invited! Food Deserts & Food Policy in Indianapolis editathon
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)

Proposed deletion of Search for the Beast


The article Search for the Beast has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM, one mention in a book is insufficient"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  13:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

You're invited! Environmental Justice editathons in Indianapolis & Bloomington
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC).)

missing
Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Eric T. Olson (philosopher) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric T. Olson (philosopher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eric T. Olson (philosopher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. A MINOTAUR (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Chester Lake.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chester Lake.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

File:BrianCassidyPromo.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BrianCassidyPromo.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)