User talk:Redfarmer/Archives/2010/July

Albanian Songs of the Frontier Warriors
Hi Redfarmer, and thank you for dropping by my talk page. Please see the response in the DYK for Albanian Songs of the Frontier Warriors. It should be Ok. Thank you! --SulmuesLet's talk 18:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Please see my response in DYK page and changed hook. --SulmuesLet's talk 18:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * From this I see that it should be 1,500 characters, not words. I have 3600+ characters by now (without calculating the citation), so it should be fine. --SulmuesLet's talk 19:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problems, Redfarmer, thanks again for your help! --SulmuesLet's talk 19:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ops, one thing, although you already OK-ed it. I saw that you said good faith pass, because the references are offline, but they are all inline. In fact if you go to sources you can see the entire preface of Elsie's book. Bye now and happy fourth of July! --SulmuesLet's talk 20:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Victor Adamson
Hello! Your submission of Victor Adamson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jappalang (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Law & Order: Los Angeles - I want an apology!
Redfamer I want an apology,

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Law_%26_Order:_Los_Angeles&oldid=372263832

I HAD a credible source. Entertainment Weekly! I see I didn't put a ref by Skeet's name in the starring list. But it WAS at the bottom in the cast/characters section at least. I could see if just left a statement there a no credible reference! I think I deserve an apology for something. --SVU4671 (talk) 03:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Law & Order: Los Angeles - IMDb
The ref from Kristen Kruek was IMDb (Internet Movie Database) which insn't the most credible as you can see now the page for L&O: LA at IMDb. But I had a ref for it too in the casting/characters section to IMDb as I do recall.

So actually I am due that appology for the reference, not the IMDb (which isn't credible 100%).

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Law_%26_Order:_Los_Angeles&diff=371285453&oldid=371115726

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Law_%26_Order:_Los_Angeles&diff=370836483&oldid=370834783 —Preceding unsigned comment added by SVU4671 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Law & Order: Los Angeles - Did you read?
Did you not see where I said IMDB is NOT 110% credible. DID YOU NOT SEE WHERE I SAID THAT?! I'm done, let's drop it. It's done, been reedited, it's in the past, no real harm done, let's move on!--SVU4671 (talk) 18:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Sock
A while ago, we had this discussion on my talk page about a disruptive sockpuppet. Unfortunately, I think they're back: User:Lillypad2. I've had my suspicions for a while, but I backed off to give them a chance. It's the same old, same old though. They're edit warring on Jon & Kate Plus 8 and going back to all the same articles they did before (90210, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, Smallville, etc.). I've reported them to AIV, but I'm not as familiar with sockpuppet reporting. --132 13:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, this (User:174.91.247.34) is the most recent IP. --132 13:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * How could I have not noticed this. It was right in my face. He/she is always unlinking valid links.  It's been a while since their last block and I figured they finally got the hint.    Mike   Allen   23:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)