User talk:Redg22

Speedy deletion of Justin hendrix
A tag has been placed on Justin hendrix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Spy optic
A tag has been placed on Spy optic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eastlygod (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Spy optic
First off, welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions.

I appreciate that your creation of the Spy optic article is in good faith, however, Wikipedia is not the place for school projects and other test pages, please see What Wikipedia is not. The article currently reads as advertising, as it only has links to that companies products, which violates Wikipedia's policies. If you believe the company deserves an article, feel free to re-create it, with a neutral and unbiased Point of View.

Thanks you again for your contributions. --Eastlygod (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)