User talk:Redlabel9562/sandbox

User talk:Redlabel9562/sandbox1Redlabel9562 (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Nayland Blake
1. Everything stated in the Nayland Blake article was deemed relevant to the artist. I was not distracted by any unnecessary fluff. Probably because the article page very short. 2. The article appears neutral in its representation of Mr. Blake with no evident of bias one way or another. 3. I believe that the viewpoint on Nayland Blake's "most famous" art piece was underrepresented along with any work he has done, no pictures of his work are included within the article. 4. The citations I checked did seem to work. One source was from the Village Voice, which I would not consider a proper source to be referencing from, but I could be wrong. 5. As listed above I found one source from the Village Voice, a potential unreliable source to be citing from. I also noted a moderate amount of facts listed without any references at all. Another source listed is from an interview in which Mr. Blake participated in. An interview with the subject as a potential source could lead to biased opinions from the individual about themselves. No Biases are noted within the article. 6. Information seems up to date. Most recent edits shown are from end of 2017 and one edit already made in 2018. I am not sure if anything is missing. I will have to thoroughly research the artist myself to determine the proper answer to that question. 7. The talk page of the article is sparse. Two relatively new posts were added late 2017. One user noted that information on Nayland Blake is difficult to locate. The original author also posted a brief note asking anyone with any sources on Mr. Blake to share them. A great peer review was done by Gwang3, the user mentioned the possibility of adding a separate section dedicated to Mr. Blake's art contributions. 8. The article is rated as Start-Class on the projects quality scale. The article is a part of WikiProject Biography, WikiProject LGBT studies, and WikiProject African diaspora. 9. Wikipedia simply states the facts, certain art pieces, and biography of the artist. As we have only had two class sessions, one of which was on the use of wikipedia, I am not sure about how we discuss these topics in class.