User talk:Redlance

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Saedirof for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Youonlylivetwice (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This is really catch22 situation for me. My IP was blocked saying it was proxy zombie and here was the message that I need to talk. Well, now thanks to Zzuuzz and I can talk now.

Youonlylivetwice, seems to be hell bent on vandalizing Mudaliar and Sengunthar sites. His tone and tenor of the edits as well as presenting facts twisted, alluding to derogatory remarks. I am also shocked and dismayed the obsession with which he goes on editing the page only filled with derogatory stuff. Looks like this user has been doing colossal damage to the wiki in the name of facts. I, also feel that he has personal animosity towards this community.

I believe there are facts about many communities Jews, Muslims, Christians but if the community feels it's derogatory it's best left ignored and not dragged into public, digging up history only to malign a community is not going to benefit anyone and I trust Wiki would continue to serve in the best interests of various communities.

I could have as well gone and started another edit war but I feel we need to have permanent resolution. This can only be achieved with help of protection as well as the admins understand the material presented here. I'm looking forward for an early resolution.Redlance (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you believe that User:Kokarako Gumango is using sockpuppets and wish to get further people's comments on the matter, you should create a report at Suspected sock puppets and follow the instructions there. I denied your 2nd request for page protection, because the two of you are in an edit war and there aren't enough disruptive edits to justify protection.  Each time you revert or change an edit of that user, you are taking one step closer to breaking WP:3RR.  You could easily be blocked already with your edits.  I am not going to take sides and protect the page with your most recent edit, and even if I did, it will never be protected indefinitely.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Venki123 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kokarako Gumango (talk) 06:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, lets colloborate on the article too while the sock puppetry case is getting resolved. Saedirof (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * yeah sure, lets do it and possible get more people involved. Sengunthamitran and Socio economic services are two sources of information. Also I have Senguntha Prapandha Thiratu.Redlance (talk) 06:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Is it in electronic format? It'd be great to go through it. Saedirof (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, I intend to do it and may be host it somewhere. Any idea on good hosting site? You can email me http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Redlance


 * I have emailed via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Redlance.Saedirof (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case notification
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Suspected sock puppets/Sureshmaran. Thank you. ShivNarayanan (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)