User talk:Redman1004

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiderman007786 (May 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spiderman007786 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spiderman007786, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spiderman007786 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spiderman007786 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * You guys are just unfair, you know that, right!? Redman1004 (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I can only assume that you are joking? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * oh I am not I had 4 REAL wikipedia publishments deleted Redman1004 (talk) 15:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * And I just want to have one at least on real publishment Redman1004 (talk) 15:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I suggest you familiarise yourself with WP:YFA, WP:REFB and WP:GNG, they will give you a good grounding in how to write an article that has a chance of being published. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * hey look I did a real one about abount how to stop Scammers and they just delete it. Redman1004 (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * it took me 5 week to complete and it's just thrown in the dust like it was nothing! Redman1004 (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, if they were anything like this, I'm not surprised. You submit an incomplete sentence, which provides no meaningful information or context, and not a single source supporting it, and you expect it to be published in the encyclopaedia? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I wrote that on purpose so you can be a bit more merciful with people Redman1004 (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * they deleted my account for litterally no reason! Redman1004 (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * fine, delete it you can even block my account. I just wanted you to know, be a bit more merciful I don't wanna make you the bad guy Redman1004 (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * just to knowyou have been the most merciful one yet I understand I did a bd job writing a page and you encourage me to write a new one and learn. But some just, dont want to let you because I'm new or not experienced with editing, but I also wanna say thank you for not being like others. Redman1004 (talk) 16:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for being and reacting this it is just that I've had other user that don't let do practically anything so I thought you were on of them and I just was tired of this and acted this way Redman1004 (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * some have even blocked me from chatting TWICE! Redman1004 (talk) 16:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Unfairness in wikipedia


A tag has been placed on Draft:Unfairness in wikipedia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an "attack page" or an unsourced biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity, or articles about living people that are entirely negative and unsourced. Attack pages, attack files and negative unreferenced BLPs are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing
 * It contains a gallery in the userspace which consists chiefly of fair use or non-free images. (See section U3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot allow non-free and copyrighted images to be used on user pages, and user pages containing galleries of such images may be eligible for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)