User talk:Rednbluearmy

A tag has been placed on Sacred archery society, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DarkSaber2k 13:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
anyone who reads Geert Hofstede must be a welcome addition to Wikipedia. I hope you stick around. It requires patience, and takes some getting used to, but you can make a real contribuiton if you can tolerate the nonsense.Historicist (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Do click on your name in red letters at the top of this page and write something about yourself. a red lettered name makes you look like a novice, and can open your edits to rapid deletion.Historicist (talk) 14:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2014
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. ''Most of your recent contributions have added links to http://www.kwintessential.co.uk which makes it appear that you are spamming it, particlarly when the site itself is not a reliable source. Please stop. Thanks'' SmartSE (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Based on your feedback I will now be going through as much content I can and removing links webmasters have added in order to gain links to their websites. As their links are poor quality in terms of relevance, this will further improve the quality of the wiki. thanks and all the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rednbluearmy (talk • contribs)


 * Yes please do - you might want to explain what you're doing in the edit summary so people know why you're doing it. Mentioning WP:ELNO in the edit summary is sensible. Cheers SmartSE (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)