User talk:Redpillseeker

Welcome
Hello Redpillseeker and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Christie's International Real Estate, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Christie's International Real Estate. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  01:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Not only are there the problems that Julietdeltalima identified above, but it's not clear how your addition relates to the subject of the article. Normally I would say to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. That's still the best route forward, but remember that the WP:BLP requirement that controversial statements be sourced applies to talk pages as well as articles. —C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Christie's International Real Estate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)