User talk:Redrosita71

Welcome!

Hello, Redrosita71, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

December 2011
Please do not remove official links from articles. According to our external linking guidelines, official links are listed as normally to be included. Yworo (talk) 19:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Also, we can only link to YouTube videos placed there by the copyright holder. In this case, that is not an official BBC upload and we cannot link to it, as it violates the BBC's copyright. Yworo (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fulgur Limited, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fulgur Limited was changed by Redrosita71 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867048 on 2011-12-19T20:27:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Fulgur Limited. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In particular, all quoted material requires a directly-following full citation to the work from which it is taken. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 20:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Fulgur Limited with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  - blake - 20:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Self-published sources
Just FYI, Lashtal.com would not be considered a reliable source. As Paul Feazy is the owner of the site, it is considered a self-published source. Self-published sources are rarely considered reliable. Yworo (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Fulgur Limited.  - blake - 20:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Fulgur Limited shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Yworo (talk) 20:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Yworo (talk) 22:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello Redrosita71. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fulgur Limited, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review
I hear you about not being able to find the sources in six days. On the other hand, I can't in good faith withdraw the nomination. The process has already started and I have yet to see a single in-depth source.

However, don't panic. Should the outcome be deletion and you later find sources, you can take those sources to Deletion review and, assuming the sources are found adequate, the article will be restored. Deleted articles are never lost, they are still in the database, simply not accessible except to administrators.

Hope this helps. Don't let this ruin your holidays. That was certainly not my intent. Yworo (talk) 12:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I've also posted a request for assistance from WikiProject Books. If anyone besides yourself would have access to any restricted or offline sources which might support notability, the members of that project are among them. Perhaps you could help point them to places to look? Yworo (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)