User talk:Redtigerxyz/Archive 17

Uttarakhand
Hello redtigerxyz, i have decided to take Uttarakhand for FAN as it has gone under a peer review and also a copydeit drive.What are your thoughts? Is there some thing lacking still with the article?Regards!!--Ayanosh (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Help needed...
Hi my new friend, Redtigerxyz! I am Tamravidhir. I recently nominated Tourism in West Bengal for FA but it was declined, I have a to-do list here and here...I request you to help me. Please help me. I have been in touch with User:Moonriddengirl and more others..and they have been really helpful. However, they are packed up with their own to-do list so Moonriddengirl asked me to come to you.When replying please leave me a Tb template. Thank you so much!

You also seem to share the same interest as me (i.e. history). So I may like to have a review of the following articles by you:


 * Review of the following needed


 * Nawabs of Bengal & Murshidabad
 * Murshid Quli Khan
 * Sarfaraz Khan
 * Shuja-ud-Din Muhammad Khan
 * Alivardi Khan
 * Siraj ud-Daulah
 * Mir Jafar
 * Mir Qasim
 * Najimuddin Ali Khan
 * Najabut Ali Khan
 * Ashraf Ali Khan
 * Baber Ali Khan
 * Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan
 * Ahmad Ali Khan
 * Mubarak Ali Khan (Nawab of Bengal)
 * Mansur Ali Khan
 * Hassan Ali Mirza
 * Wasif Ali Mirza
 * Waris Ali Mirza

Bhima
Someone has forwarded article Bhima for GA review, but I don't think it is GA review. You are a primary contributor of the article. If you also feel same, please withdraw the nomination before the review begins (as a primary contributor). -- Tito Dutta  ✉  05:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

59th National Film Awards
Hello! You had commented in the Peer Review of this article. It is now a FLC and your comments would be welcome. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment on reference formatting
Hi! Can you please comment here? This is on formatting of references. The article follows the style used in Ganesha, but I doubt whether that would be accepted in FAC at present (due to the mixing of different styles). Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:56, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. When you recently edited Kalyanasundara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * - Tito Dutta  ✉  13:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Yoga (GA Reassessment)
The Yoga article was recently tagged for multiples issues by an editor. Last week, I too had tagged a paragraph in Upanishadic and early Buddhist era section for failed verification of references. Some paragraphs in the article are just one line long, others are completely unreferenced. The way I see it, it would take a lot of effort by any editor to bring this article up to GA level. Do you think the article can be improved easily? Do you intend to improve it or should we go for a GA reassessment? Would like to know your thoughts. Regards. Correct Knowledge «৳alk» 14:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Please allow clarifications of the word Hindu
Dear Redtigerxyz,

I see that you have undone my comments regarding the use of the term "Hindu." Obviously you know much more than me about how Wikipedia works, and you more scholarly than I. However, the fact remains that "Hindu" is not a Vedic term, and is offensive to enlightened adherents of the Vedas, who use the term only as a concession. Why do you insist on deleting my attempts to set the record straight? I am deeply offended by your actions which I perceive as a form of religious intolerance.

There must be some common ground. How do you suggest we convey the realization that the term "Hindu" is foreign imposition in a manner which will not be offensive to those who insist on using this misnomer?

Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter.

Das' Osmi A Servant am I Madhavadasa.Dasa@yahoo.com rozenthalm@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rozenthalm (talk • contribs) 12:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The origins of the word "Hindu" are not needed on every article that uses the word "Hindu". A article called Hindu discusses the etymology. You may add neutral worded and verifiable origins of the word in the "Etymology" section. The text added in Hindu texts was not neutral. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the information
Please do whatever you people feel about the page as I have certain other matters to attend. --Bhadani (talk) 05:38, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Not interested, plz don't take it personally. --Bhadani (talk) 06:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Kagapujandar
Hi, I've provided third party reference links in that above mentioned article. Also editing the article from the reliable sources. Give me time to improve the article. Also remove the article from 'Articles of Deletion' page. Thank you. Arulraja (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Arulraja

The term "Hinduism" is offensive to the knowers of the Vedas.
Dear Redtigerxyz,

The religion of India is Dharma, not Hinduism. Imagine an article about Judaism and Christianity written by radical Muslims. You my feel that your viewpoint is neutral, but all knowledgeable Vedic authorities will find it close minded and biased.

There must be some middle ground which will allow us to use the term Hinduism and still inform the reader that the actual religion of the Vedas is Dharma. For example: "Hinduism or Dharma"

Yours truly, Madhavadasa Das Madhavadasa.dasa@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rozenthalm (talk • contribs) 02:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kalyanasundara
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ravananugraha
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kangiten
Hello! Your submission of Kangiten at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon (talk) 00:17, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

You article request
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B86iegI5pG5TNTNhaWVmVDdxaWs

Please let me know when you are done. Churn and change (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annamalaiyar Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nayanar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Rameswaram
Requesting you to participate here.- Ravi My Tea Kadai 10:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Ganesh_Chaturthi
Hello, not sure why a recently link added was removed. It was by means no Propmotional link. The site provides lots of information on Hindu God Ganesha. There are videos and Blog articles related on the site. No products or other things are sold either. I see a similar site, which was not removed by you. The site added was Ganpati.tv


 * Ganpati.tv seems like a blog and yahoo group or Facebook group like site. Such sites are not encouraged on Wikipedia as external links. Wikipedia only retains informational sites. Please remove any similar site left in the list. Thanks. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Yes i agree, however, this site is very informative and giving accurate information. If you see the Blog, it has so many articles providing additional information to the viewers. Should be a valuable source for the readers towards Hindu Lord Ganesha. Should be reconsidered. Appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganpatitv (talk • contribs) 17:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Vinayaki
I copyedited this article and I'd like you to check that I didn't mess anything up through lack of knowledge. Also, I've changed the Did You Know hook to read "referred to as a female Ganesha" instead of "referred to as female Ganesha"; I think it's reasonable to provide an informational link on Ganesha, and there seemed to me to be a need for either "the" or "a" in the phrase, but I wasn't sure which would be better. Since I'm about to promote the prep set to a queue (unless some other admin does so first), please let me know if you're unhappy with that hook change. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kangiten
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * 2) Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code.  Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * 3) Create your account by entering the requested information.  (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * 4) You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID.  (The account is now active for 1 year).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

DYK for Vinayaki
Yngvadottir (talk) 08:03, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Bro that's the pic of Kala Bhairava carrying the decapitated head of Brahma
Bro that's the pic of Kala Bhairava carrying the decapitated head of Brahma, that's pictorial representation of the puranic fact , nothing is wrong in that. That pic is almost on the every shrine of Kala Bhairav in Rajasthan, and people use it in their homes also for worshipping Bheruji. You can verify it by your own too. so please refrain from deleting anything factual without giving any substantial reasoning. thankx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkumararun (talk • contribs) 06:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rameswaram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nayanar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Discussion of author Babasaheb Purandare at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard
There is a discussion at the RS Noticeboard as to whether Purandare qualifies as a WP:RS for the article Shivaji. Discussion posted here: Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Tulsi Peeth
Is it good enough for GA? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:54, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * +I guess that there is no need of the POV template on Tulsi Peeth edition of the Ramcharitmanas. It seems to have the coverage of almost everything the sources say. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:56, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

english vinglish
hello. you removed the third oppinion tag, actually it was to help one user to deliberately understand that the post on youtube and twitter by the official legal owner of english vinglish can be referred as a relaible source of informationvkdlms (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012
Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:44, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Out of my depth
I am out of my depth wrt to some issues relating to Hinduism etc. Could you perhaps take a look at User_talk:Sitush when you have some time? The person who is querying me is fairly new to Wikipedia and is having a bit of a rough time. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 10:03, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for stepping in. - Sitush (talk) 13:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Kanchipuram
Yes - will do. As per municipality website, it is Kancheepuram - would it be better to use that way? I have a footnotes mentioning the same. Ssriram mt (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anatta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatman (Hindu philosophy)
You have been very helpful.However,I have noticed that even though there is a page Anatman but there is no article to fill that particular page; presently Anatman redirects to Anatta. This being so, the page Anatman can carry as it is my proposed article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatman (Hindu philosophy) but re-titled as Anatman, with the section 11 – Anatman in Advaita Vedanta of Anatta pointing to my proposed article. In case my proposed article is accepted you and I can improve it. You already know about the importance of Adi Shankara in Indian Thought. Regards.Soni Ruchi (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Golden Tara
Need your help - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yogesh_Khandke/sandbox_Golden_tara Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thought Hindu deities would be in your field of interest. The present article is merely a redirect which is a pity. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:46, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Are there stand alone Buddhist deities? Isn't Buddhism godless? Do what you can if it interests you. I have collected a few links in my sand box. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 18:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 6
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 regarding an issue with which your opinion may be of value. Thanks  --  I'm Titanium  chat  15:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to Wikiproject Shaktism
Appreciate your contributions to improving Shaktism related articles. It would be an honour if you could join the group WikiProject Hinduism/Shaktism
 * sids 12:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)(UTC) User talk:Sidsahu

DYK Nomination for Geet Ramayan
Hi. Me and Dharmadhyaksha (formerly known as Animeshkulkarni) have expanded the article Geet Ramayan and pushed it for DYK on 24th Oct i.e. Vijayadashmi. We would really appreciate if you can help us in getting it reviewed so that we can achieve the target date. Here is the link. - Vivvt &bull;&#32; (Talk ) 17:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick review. We really appreciate your help. - Vivvt &bull;&#32; (Talk ) 18:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Ahsham (Mughal Infantry)
I think you are expert in Pictures. Please take a look on my article also.--Goldduck58 (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Fair use images in Pan Twardowski
Hi Redtigerxyz, I'm a little confused about you removal of a movie screenshot from Pan Twardowski. The article does discuss works of art inspired by the legend including the film from which the screenshot is taken. Doesn't it provide a fair use rationale? What's additionally confusing is that you didn't remove the book cover, which is a fair use image too, using practically the same rationale. I'm probably not getting something, so I'd be grateful for an explanation. — Kpalion(talk) 19:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Laura reviewed those hooks
Redtigerxyz, I wanted to let you know that LauraHale did review those hooks a little while ago, and approved both Clarke and Stephenson (Stevenson?). Since Prep 1, amazingly, was still not completed, I put Clarke back into the lead spot where you'd had it.

I may be moving a couple of your hooks from prep 1 to prep 2: prep 1 will run between midnight and 8am London time, and it's generally a good idea to have local hooks run when the local people can see them. So Helen Porter and/or the HMS Ambrose could be in prep 2 sometime in the next hour or so. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Inuse template
I guess you don't know that you shouldn't be edit a prep area when someone else has put the Inuse template on it, meaning that they're working on assembling hooks for it. Next time, please do refrain. At the very least, a query as to whether I was done would have been in order. (I had some ISP problems for a bit there, which is why it has taken me so long.) BlueMoonset (talk) 05:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)
{||}

DYK for Brihat Jataka
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Chedipe
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * liked the story of the naked tiger-riding witch vampires who break the peace of family.--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) -- Redtigerxyz Talk 16:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Churel
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Brihat Jataka
I was a copyeditor, expander here in AFC also NS, why didn't you add my name there? --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Naraka (Hinduism)
The DYK project (nominate) 08:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Jeez, looking at those photo panels, I was so scared! I have to decrease my meat and alcohol intake it seems.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, for scaring you. Warning, you may see other fearsome Hindu/Indian beings on DYK soon. :) -- Redtigerxyz Talk 16:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
I am back in circulation on Wikipedia. Here is much deserved barnstar for you.

Varanasi
Are you interested in getting this up to GA then? Did you add the urls as refs or was that NVV, can you fix those?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Is there any issue still to be attended by me in the Sittanavasal articles?

Thanks. By the way do you wish to take Varanasi to DYK. and if so do you want any more text to be added to it? I have almost completed my inputs except for a few more sentences on myths and history.-- Nvvchar . 14:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


 * You may like to join me on this Dev Deepawali article for DYK to be brought out on 28 November.-- Nvvchar . 17:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the shift with Varanasi included. Dr. B's action is related to problem with some user ( I have no idea who). Usually, he writes to me a mail. But this time I have not received any mail so far.-- Nvvchar . 16:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Can I nominate Dev Deepawali and can you also suggest a hook. Also, I have completed Amalaka Ekadashi. You may like to edit it. Others will be betaken up after Deepawali. Here is Wishing you and yours a very happy and prosperous Deepawali.-- Nvvchar . 18:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Can I post the beautiful picture of the aarti which you have deleted as I though it would look good on the front page. Thanks for the editing. By the way are there two Shakti Peethas in Varanasi, one is the well where the her ear ring fell and the other is of Vishalakshi Temple where the eyes fell?-- Nvvchar . 18:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Nome'd Amalaka Ekadashi.-- Nvvchar . 19:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Tulsidas
It would be great to have Tulsidas as FA or GA, but my account is no longer active so can you please nominate?

The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)
---
 * }
 * Read this newsletter
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 November 2012
 * }

Shanta
I've moved Shanta. You're right, disambiguation is not necessary when there's nothing to disambiguate. Thank you for notifying Requested moves/Technical requests.--xanchester (t)  06:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 08:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Rakshasa
I add some Images to this article please see them.--Bad Buu (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject India Assessment Request
Hey, could you have a look at my assessment request about the article Meerut. (Not everything in your original suggestions has been done, but its better than then). Thanks and regards--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 14:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Shakti Peetha, Varanasi
I have created the article on Shakti Peetha, Varanasi. You may like to add further. I could not find a photo of the Vishalaksi temple or the Mankarnika Ghat.-- Nvvchar . 15:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I tried to start this article but a warning that an article of this title Putrada Ekadashi, created in wiki in 2010 has been deleted comes up. How do I proceed?-- Nvvchar . 06:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Please merge Shakti Peetha, Varanasi with Vishalaksi as I am not familiar with the merging process without loosing our contributions and other users contributions on the Vishalakshi page which is existing since 2006. I have the Putrada Ekadasi article almost ready in my files which I can post. Shall I post it under the title Pudrada Ekadasis since I know that there are two of them. -- Nvvchar . 05:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

OK. But, I don't have user rights.-- Nvvchar . 05:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Since I have not used any of the rights so far, I can not confirm what rights I have on my page.-- Nvvchar . 06:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added some more text and an infobox to this article Vishalakshi Temple and the last section was not referenced. As anticipated there is deletion notice on Putrada Ekadashi article on this talk page. I have also completed Shakti Peetha, Varanasi and Pavitropana Ekadashi. We can post all three tomarrow if you agree. I thought you would be right person to nominate them. Thanks.-- Nvvchar . 01:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * This suggestion "Vishalakshi Temple: complete merge of Shakti Peetha, Varanasi pending. Need to add about temple structure, central icon, not done yet" is not clear to me. I thought we were posting the Shakti Peetha, Varanasi as a separate article. I could not get any details about the temple structure.-- Nvvchar . 06:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I have merged fully text from Shakti Peetha, Varanasi with Vishalakshi Temple manually. Please see if it is OK. I have also completed my inputs to Putrada Ekadashi and Pavitropana Ekadashi. Please nominate all of them if you find them all completed. I could not find any reference to describe the temple structure. I also found these two Shakthi Peethas in Pakistan, Shivaharkaray and Hinglaj Mata Mandir, which we could expand, I have added an infobox to the latter artcile. -- Nvvchar . 16:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Hook sounds interesting.-- Nvvchar . 18:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Nice hook. I am doing the search for the Pausmas ekadashi but could hardly find any text to add more to the text that already exists there. You may find this reference  of use to our articles in future. Yes, I will start on the new article you have suggested. On the Shakti Peethas in Pakistan there are ten references of BBC (originating from the main news item) and also of the Teertha Yatra Management Organization (will it be acceptable as reliable reference) but no book source at all. I will be going back from San Diego to India tomorrow morning and will be BTW from 23rd instant. Thanks.-- Nvvchar . 19:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * * I have done substantial work on Bimala Shaktipeeth. But I am not sure of the four Skathi peethas given in the image. I will add after I return to Delhi, and also start on other articles mentioned by you.-- Nvvchar . 03:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * This Mokshada Ekadashi is also done.


 * I have created this Kamada Ekadashi. There is likely to be a deletion notice as this article had been created in 2010 and deleted. Please take care of any such issues. I will also address when it is posted on my talk page. Thanks.-- Nvvchar . 00:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Page range question
Hi! I faintly remember there was some discussion during Ahalya FAC on this issue. Can you please have a look at and comment. May be you are aware of some mos guideline.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Putrada Ekadashi


A tag has been placed on Putrada Ekadashi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: *It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. (←misunderstanding)
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr  T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 12:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I have also contested the deletion.-- Nvvchar . 02:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR
Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free JSTOR account via the requests page. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org) with...


 * the subject line "JSTOR"
 * your English Wikipedia username
 * your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif;">Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   20:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nirjala Ekadashi
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Removed merge tags on Watatsumi/Ryūjin
I removed the merge tags you placed on the Watatsumi and Ryūjin articles. Please note that the Template:Merge guideline: "After adding the merge template, please create a section on the talkpage explaining your rationale for the merge proposal." Thanks! Prburley (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Amalaka Ekadashi
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Appreciation
Parsh (talk) 12:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: Adi shaktipeethas
I was going by the article on Shakti Peethas which says the Shiva Purana, the Devi Bhagavata, the Kalika Purana and the AstaShakti recognize these 4 as the main Shakti Peethas. I looked again and saw no reference was given in the article. As for Bimala there is very little material, on a recent trip to Puri, I had to ask 4 pandas and 2 policemen before i could locate the temple. Regards PS: Was the page name change to to Vimala Temple necessary? The goddess is popularly known as Bimala.
 * sids (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * While I endorse the change of name, I like your hook suggestion as it goes well with the img of Vimala. I have added two more images relevant to the text in the article.-- Nvvchar . 07:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Yes, We should try for GA. Thanks. I will start on Hinglaj Mata shortly.-- Nvvchar . 16:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Both hooks are good. Img of Vimala could be added as the temple img is very faint.-- Nvvchar . 19:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

May like to add User:sids (talk) in the creidt list since we have used the text posted on the talk page and minor edits with img contribution. -- Nvvchar . 04:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Fine. The other two Ekadasi articles are to be edited and posted on DYK, for the Mokshada Ekadashi todate is 5th day for nomination. Meanwhile, I have also started on Varuthini Ekadashi.-- Nvvchar . 16:52, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Any suggestion for the hook for Mokshada as I have not been able to select one.-- Nvvchar . 16:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Nome'd on 22nd Nov., date. May like to change the hook or add a new img.-- Nvvchar . 17:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hinglaj Mata article is now substantially expanded. References provided by you were useful.You may now like to add and c/e it.-- Nvvchar . 09:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Adi shaktipeethas
You could rename them the 4 Tantra Pithas instead of deleting the template in view of the references in Vimala Temple sids (talk) 13:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC) Vested interest declared: created the page