User talk:Redwolfb14

8u8 and diffs screenies
Wizardry Dragon this is the 3rd time i'm asking you please stay off of this talk page. Screenshot 8u8 and Lou Dobbs diff pages. I need those. PLEASE DO NOT REVERT THIS PAGE. Note: His page is "protected". Forward appropriately. Thanks.

Wizardy Dragon is clearly not adhering to guideline. --Redwolfb14 21:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

My reason
UPDATE: The subsequent link/diff has been removed mysteriously. Please send screenies. NOTE: Please see Not_following_guidelines This exist because the editor in question simply did not take the time to read this talk page. The below is the editors commentary on the subject and should be taken with a grain of salt. As you can see via the diffs, there were no "threats" made. It's the usual "this person threatened me" excuse. As I consider the argument to be complete this is all I have left to say on the matter I will subsequently be removing this in the future after people STOP REVERTING THIS PAGE. --Redwolfb14 18:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Because blanking your talk page is vandalism. I Lov  E Plankton 17:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * it doesn't matter if you added something, removing other peoples comments is vandalism. I  Lov  E Plankton 17:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Again it doesn't matter whether or not there was still something on your talk page. if you remove others comments you are vandalising. I  Lov  E Plankton 17:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * And if the prevous comments had already been discussed, and you don't want them on your talk page, then archive them. I  Lov  E Plankton 17:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If you archive the comments then they can be removed, but you didn't archive so they can't be removed. I  Lov  E Plankton 17:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * And also do not remove warnings . I  Lov  E Plankton 17:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If there are no warnings what is this Please stop blanking pages. This is considered vandalism - even if it is your own talk page. If you have issues with anything anyone has said, you can always as them to remove their comment. -- Wizardry Dragon 21:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)? And I have read that page and I am adhereing to it, you are not. I  Lov  E Plankton 18:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * And just so you know I forwarded your message to Wizardry dragon. I  Lov  E Plankton 18:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

1. oh i'm scared. 2. who was it for then? I Lov  E Plankton 18:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for trying to help you, and just so you know saying Forward appropriately is misleading, and I will thank you not to threaten me. I  Lov  E Plankton 18:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

this was taken from my talk, it is a qoute from you. ''Otherwise I'm going to escalate this further. --Redwolfb14 18:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)'' how is that not a threat? I Lov  E Plankton 16:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * and your note is bordering on a personal attack, so I suggest you read this WP:NPA. I  Lov  E Plankton 16:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks. Stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack — it is a statement regarding the actions of the user, not a statement about the user. There is a difference between "You are a troll" and "You are acting like a troll", but "You seem to be making statements just to provoke people" is even better, as it means the same without descending to name-calling. Similarly, a comment such as "responding to accusation of bad faith by user X" in an edit summary or on a talk page is not a personal attack against user X.
 * Furthermore i'm tired of discussing this. Why you continue it is beyond me. You were wrong, that's not a crime in and of itself but to continue to be wrong and protest in strength is not something I can tolerate. Please, lets let bygones be bygones, you made a mistake, it is over. As I said above I will summarily be removing this. What is the problem now? --Redwolfb14 16:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Whatever, you twist the meaning of policys to suit yourself. I  Lov  E Plankton 20:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks
With regards to your comments on User talk:Wizardry Dragon: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, -Will Beback 00:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Can you point out the personal attack I made? IE: That is usually helpful if you are claiming personal attacks. --Redwolfb14 17:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * This edit summary, "HereToHelp, more like HereToWhine or HereIDontWannaFollowTheRulesMommy", is inappropriate and unnecessary. -Will Beback 19:05, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * True, my apologies --Redwolfb14 01:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)