User talk:Redwretch

I must not have made myself clear.

When I said that citation is needed on the revision to the definition added at 7 o'clock pm on July 25th to the Chickenhawk page, I meant that I believe one must justify claiming that "many proponents" support a meaning which until very recently I have never seen.

Revising to insert a link to an article written TODAY in which the author takes on what I thought to be the standard meaning of the word, does nothing to prove that "many proponents" have in fact made public this new level of meaning. An acceptable citation would be any article written by a prominent blogger/writer/politician before July 25th, 2006 (today), in which this added usage occurs. If it is not possible to show a recorded instance of this usage by "many people" or at least one prominent voice, before July 25th 2006 (today), then the usage must be euphemeral and is an instance of vandalism.

Pookleblinky 01:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)