User talk:Reedkross/sandbox

I think that the ideas you have for edits to the article are good but will need to be more detailed when actually edited into the article. I think something you could do is add in reactions from the public to different Capital Punishment cases so that it gives an idea of what the public opinion is of not only the punishment itself but the actual cases where it has been used. Overall these edits you proposed should add a good amount of useful information to the article.Carsonfirestone (talk) 18:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

''' Peer Review '''

Hi there, I agree with you, I think that the juvenile capital punishment section is a good idea. Something I think would be helpful is to add in the hyperlinks to all of the court cases you reference. This way, if someone wants to quickly look more into the court case you list, they can just click. I think you could continue to make this section more recent than 2005.

Good start!

Kfill (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
I think adding the section about juvenile capital punishment was a great, overlooked addition. It fit well within the History category, and it didn't include a bias toward capital punishment. The tone was professional, and the citation was also verifiable. Nice work Wardmc1996 (talk) 00:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)