User talk:Reefton123

August 2012
Hello, I'm Noommos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Reefton, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Noom  talk stalk 12:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Reefton123. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Reefton, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Noom talk stalk 12:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reefton with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Noom talk stalk 12:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Reefton with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Noom talk stalk 12:54, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Reefton. Noom talk stalk 12:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)