User talk:Reemslim/July 2013 Beirut bombing

Hi, I'm glad to see that you've started making progress on your article. You've added a good chunk of new text that fleshes out the relevance of the Sunni-Shia conflict to the context of the bombing as well as some new text that provides a more vivid potrayal of the scene. Even though it provides a little bit more color, I think this second paragraph does a pretty good job of sticking to a neutral point of view and an encyclopedic tone. This can be kind of tricky to get right so I suggest that you take another look at those policies to make sure that you.

Based on some funny formatting issues with your draft, it also looks like you ran into some trouble with formatting your changes. My guess is that you copied the article into the visual editor instead of copying the wikitext into the source editor on your user page. I think that the easiest way to fix this will be to save your new text someplace (like a word document), copy the source again and then reintegrate your changes. Please ask for help if you can't figure that out.

It looks like you didn't cite new sources in your new changes, but I interpret your note as meaning that you got the information from the New York Times report. It's fine not to create new sources right now. This article has a lot of sources already but very little content from them. I'd like to see you add at least 1 new source, but it's fine if your project mostly involves adding content based on the sources that are already there.

Overall, I'm pretty excited about this choice of article. I think you'll be able to improve it substantially and help better inform the world about the bombing! Good work so far and I'm really looking forward to seeing where you take this! Groceryheist (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Message from
Hi, Just finished your peer review! Let me know if you have any questions! Martinapovolo (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Round 2 feedback
Greetings. You have received some really helpful feedback from. I strongly encourage you to take a look at her review for ideas about how next to improve your article. I think her idea of breaking the article up into sections is particularly useful. Also take another look at the feedback I left you before and reach out to me again when you'd like more feedback or think that you're ready to publish your article. Groceryheist (talk) 01:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Useful links
Here's a link to the policy on using non-free images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images Link to quality evaluation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment