User talk:Reesashukla

Welcome!
Hello, Reesashukla, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Reesashukla/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 13:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Reesashukla/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Reesashukla/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 13:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deep Datewas (May 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deep Datewas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deep Datewas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Deep_Datewas Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Deep_Datewas reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Deep Datewas


A tag has been placed on Draft:Deep Datewas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 14:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, Reesashukla. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Deep Datewas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deep Datewas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deep Datewas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanKity (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Deep Datewas for not deletion
This is an official artist page, and all the links and sources are reliable. official celeb websites have published artist's biography. On official music platforms (Amazon, spotify, youtube music, apple music) we can easily find his verified profiles and music. so this is authentic entity. there is not a reason to delete authentic entity's wiki page. anyone can visit refer. links can easily find that this is real entity. and all the information is under wikipedia's guidelines.

Pargat Singh Satauj moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pargat Singh Satauj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi germankity
 * i know that we don't count authors or writers in celebrity category but this person won Yuva sahtya academy awards. this is a biggest award in india in writers. you can understand it by america have oscar awards and india have sahtya academy awards. if a writer who awards equal to oscar award, why he is not eligible to have wikipedia page? he is famous in punjabi region. writers are not like actors that we will see their newses in papers or on tv. today newspapers give writers a small corner at the end of the paper. writers deserve to be in wikipedia atleast their achievements should be listed here. world is putting them down.. Reesashukla (talk) 08:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deep Datewas
Hello Reesashukla,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Deep Datewas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Yee no  (talk) 🍁 07:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * hi yeeno,
 * i've seen your note and i wanna tell you that this page should not be deleted because this is real entity and famous in punjabi writers and punjabi region. here is link of his punjabi wikipedia page that is approved by punjabi wikipedians. and i added more refer. to the page. so consider it again and make this page live. punjabi wikipedia page of Deep Datewas : https://pa.wikipedia.org/wiki/ਦੀਪ_ਦਾਤੇਵਾਸ Reesashukla (talk) 07:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging
Hello, Reesashukla,

Before you tag any more pages for speedy deletion, please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion. There are very strict criteria on what qualifies a page for speedy deletion, what pages they apply to and when other forms of deletion (like PRODS or AFDs) would be more appropriate. I recommend you using Twinkle which will offer you possible criteria to choose from.

You should also post a notice on the talk page of the page creator informing them that you tagged they created for deletion. This is an important step in the deletion process that you neglected to do. If you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", the program will post these notices for you so I encourage you to use it. If you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia or the deletion process, please visit the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 13:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pargat Singh Satauj
Hello, Reesashukla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pargat Singh Satauj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pargat Singh Satauj


Hello, Reesashukla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pargat Singh Satauj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)