User talk:Reference editor 1965

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of R.B. Outhwaite


The article R.B. Outhwaite has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Masum Reza 📞 13:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

R.B. Outhwaite moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, R.B. Outhwaite, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Masum Reza 📞 16:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stabmental
Hello, Reference editor 1965,

Thanks for creating Stabmental! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 01:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cassette culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Reference editor 1965. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Angelaki, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 09:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Randykitty, I am not sure what the "we" you refer to yourself as signifies. You are an individual who has taken it upon themselves to edit a modest and reasonably referenced entry on an academic journal of reputation. I am indeed connected to the publication. But I am not sure what "COI" has to do with it, in regard to my reversals of your edit... perhaps it has some connection with your "we": an imagined collective authority that is no authority at all in regard to this article -- you butchered it. Do you not have bigger and better game to go after? However, I accept that it was under-referenced and I have accepted most of your edit. What I will not accept is evident in my reversals and the explanatory notes -- and as I say, I am not sure how you would take issue with any of that with recourse to some "we"-boilerplate about COI. The normal procedure, is it not, is to flag the article as requiring further references, not machete it! Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reference editor 1965 (talk • contribs)
 * The above message is a standard warning template, I'm not responsible for the royal "we", except to say that this is posted in the name of the WP editing community. As for editing "your" article, I edit literally hundreds of articles on academic journals, it's what I specialize in. As for "butchering" the article, I cut stuff that was taken literally from the journal's website and therefore was a copyvio. My edits follow WP policy, guidelines, and common usage. Meanwhile, you'd do well reading the policies and guidelines linked in the above template. --Randykitty (talk) 12:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pelagia Goulimari


The article Pelagia Goulimari has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Randykitty (talk) 09:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Excellent work Randykitty, you create the link for Pelagia Goulimari in the body text, whilst unaccountably stripping from the page the rest of the lead editors of the journal (why? On what authority?), and then when I -- accepting your edit to the body text! -- create a purely factual page for her and say that I will shortly add references, you propose it for deletion! Is there nothing better you could be doing? Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reference editor 1965 (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, instead of making snarky remarks, you'd do well to read some of the guidelines and policies linked in the template above. Also, I see that this is not the first time that an article that you created was tagged with a BLPPROD notice, so I'd expect that you know what it is. In any case, if an editor sees a new article on a living person that has not a single reliable source, then there is no choice in the matter: such an article must be tagged with a BLPPROD tag. This is policy and must be followed. This policy came about because of several cases of abuse and is designed to protect the subjects of the biographical article. As for those lead editors, per WP:JWG we only list the current and previous editors-in-chief, not associate editors, lead editors, board members, etc., unless there are independent reliable sources that document the involvement of that person with the journal (mostly in case of scandals, when individuals reign to protest something). As for your autobio, as soon as there is at least one independent reliable source, you can remove the BLPPROD tag, but not earlier (as clearly explained in the template message above). Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)