User talk:ReformedHistory

Your submission at Articles for creation: Westover Hills Presbyterian Church has been accepted
 Westover Hills Presbyterian Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Westover_Hills_Presbyterian_Church help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Cited source
In this edit (and elsewhere), you have added information cited to "Papers of Clyde Edwin Lowry; Box 2". Are these boxes of papers available to the general public, as required by Wikipedia policy, and if so, where? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Oration corrected to reflect possession in Lowry Family Ar hives and avaialability for,research by application. ReformedHistory (talk) 16:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * "Private Lowry Family Archives Available for research by application" does not really clarify the access process. To whom does one appy? Also, private archives are not considered a reliable source since they are not published nor have they been subject to any form of editorial review. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * They are in the lengthy process of being added to a public archive. The contents have been logged, and authenticated but not yet fully catalogued due to the backlog caused by lack of funding to public archives. I have requested the process for application now that the private archive is dissolved. I will post when available. ReformedHistory (talk) 20:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)