User talk:Refriedbeansmexicano

Welcome!

Hello, Refriedbeansmexicano, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Call of Duty 9, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Empty Buffer (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Call of Duty 9
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Call of Duty 9, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page St. Anger II has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  20:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

ko:틀:서명 달기 알림 --SineBot (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Mind doing me a favor?
Stop adding bull to the St. Anger II article. You have no sources to back up what you're putting there.  Simon KSK  21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

About St. Anger II? Nah. The first St. Anger sucked major balls, so I'm not really looking foward to this album. >_>  Simon KSK  21:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hah, yeah, Ride the Lightning is awesome. In fact their first 4 albums were 5-star. The Black album was good, but it wasn't really Metallica to me.  Simon KSK  21:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hell yes! Kill Em All, Master of Puppets, Ride the Lightning, and ...And Justice for All are awesome albums. I love all the songs in those albums.  Simon KSK  22:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Call of Duty 9
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Call of Duty 9, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Schuhpuppe (talk) 21:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of St. Anger II
I have nominated St. Anger II, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/St. Anger II. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guitar Hero (novel)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Guitar Hero (novel), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Limp Dickshit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 19:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wes Borland. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  19:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)