User talk:Region190

Pristina
I don't know how putting a map of Serbia is a compromise. It just confuses the readers. ... disco spinster   talk  17:35, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * And i don't know how putting a map of Kosovo is a compromise. In this edit i added map of Serbia. And why you revert map of Kosovo, and remove map of Serbia?--Region190 (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey just so you know, when changing stuff like that on wikipedia, you really need to build a consensus before you do so. That article has used the map of Kosovo for at least five years (see this revision from May 2008) so unilaterally changing it is not acceptable given the contentiousness of this subject. Also, if you change it back again to have a map of serbia, you will risk violating the three revert rule. And for the record I have no interest in the actual substance of this argument as I am an American who is utterly unaffected by these kinds of fights. I just don't want to have to protect that article and/or block people for fighting about stuff on an online encyclopedia. Thingg &#8853; &#8855;  14:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Because "Republic of Kosovo" not have full independence, in articles should be two cards.--Region190 (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:PjeterPeter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I don't know very much Serbian, but Google translate is more than enough to confirm what you said. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 21:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

3RR Warning
Your recent editing history at Pristina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You need to build a consensus first to make a controversial edits like that. There is currently an ongoing discussion on Talk:Pristina regarding the map. Edit Warring will get you nowhere. Saying things like "Kosovo is part of Serbia" is not a reasonable justification for your edit as that is highly disputed. We can't take sides on Wikipedia, we have to be neutral. IJA (talk) 06:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


 * England is a Constituent country of the United Kingdom and therefore it doesn't have the power to recognise anything because Foreign Affairs (and therefore Diplomatic Recognition) lie with the United Kingdom.
 * I said it is biased to show Kosovo as being apart of Serbia as it is disputed (by the vast majority of the world). A neutral solution is to show Kosovo as neither being independent or being as apart of Serbia.
 * Also please don't be so pathetic that you have to result to swearing like you did here. IJA (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Keep cool
Hi there. Please remember to keep cool when the editing gets hot. Comments like these are not helpful, and only cause unnecessary drama on Wikipedia. If you disagree with another editor's contributions, please discuss it with them civilly, rather than attacking their home country. Thanks. —  Richard  BB  11:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Canvassing
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. IJA (talk) 10:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been topic banned from editing all articles related to Kosovo, broadly interpreted
Ok this is getting really ridiculous and I am running out of patience. I'm going to give you one last chance to stop your disruptive behavior or I will block you immediately. Before I get to the specifics of your editing restrictions, I would like to summarize for the record just how many things you have done already that I could have blocked you for but I haven't because I am really trying to give you a chance to be reasonable:

1-2) You personally attacked someone, which violates WP:NPA and then after I warned you above that you would be blocked for it, you arguably did it again.

3) You personally attacked someone again on Commons.

4-6) You edit warred on Pristina at least three times over a four week period.

7) You reverted my change back to the consensus version on Pristina without building a new consensus after I warned you to do so both on your talk page above and in my edit summary of the edit on Pristina.

8) You.

Finally, you have violated the restrictions on Kosovo related articles as laid out in Requests for arbitration/Kosovo many, many times.

As an administrator on the English Wikipedia and in accordance with my authority to do so as laid out in the amended portion of Requests for arbitration/Macedonia, I am banning you from editing any article related to any Kosovo topic whatsoever, broadly interpreted. If you violate this ban, you will be blocked immediately. In addition, if you make any personal attacks on anyone else, you will be blocked immediately. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 22:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FC Manas Talas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrija Kaluđerović (midfielder)


The article Andrija Kaluđerović (midfielder) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nemanja Ćosović


The article Nemanja Ćosović has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Milan Jelovac


The article Milan Jelovac has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nikola Gačević


The article Nikola Gačević has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dejan Jovančov


The article Dejan Jovančov has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nikola Sekulić


The article Nikola Sekulić has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nemanja Mijušković


The article Nemanja Mijušković has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adi Bambur


The article Adi Bambur has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Srđan Šćepanović


The article Srđan Šćepanović has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Željko Tomašević


The article Željko Tomašević has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Goran Vukliš


The article Goran Vukliš has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marko Vuković


The article Marko Vuković has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danin Talović


The article Danin Talović has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vojin Jeknić


The article Vojin Jeknić has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Milroslav Kovačević


The article Milroslav Kovačević has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jovan Šljivančanin


The article Jovan Šljivančanin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ognjen Šinik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ognjen Šinik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ognjen Šinik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Loan
Template:Loan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GiantSnowman 14:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)