User talk:RegionMediaACT

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RegionMediaACT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:RegionMediaACT/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ARandomName123&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:RegionMediaACT/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 01:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, RegionMediaACT, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorials
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Jeff G. ツ 02:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * See also WP:MFA.  — Jeff G. ツ 02:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Region Media (January 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Region Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Region_Media Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Region_Media reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Kinu t/c 05:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I completely do not understand what is happening - this has been an absolutely baffling day.
 * On my first day drafting an article for wikipedia, I've tried to write something informative about a digital news platform, in exactly the same style as multiple other news organisations operating in our area.
 * I've removed anything self promoting and provided multiple external links about the organisation, from reputable third party bodies in the media including the Australian national broadcaster and two prominent universities.
 * I am not being paid to write this. Why are these articles about other local news companies OK, but mine is not?
 * The Canberra Times
 * WIN Television
 * ABC Radio Canberra
 * Australian Community Media
 * Prime7 News
 * I have been knocked back once, treated with real rudeness - if not contempt - by at least one editor while asking for help, received multiple confusing responses, told I responded too quickly, told I shouldn't be on wiki commons and now I'm being blocked.
 * The site itself is almost impossible to navigate without experience, so I had to google externally to find answers to quite simple tasks.
 * Is this how wikipedia is supposed to work? I feel bullied and shocked at how confusing, negative and difficult the experience has been over the course of no more than a few hours.
 * All I want to do is submit an article - similar to the above - about an interesting local media organisation. This has been a genuinely awful and quite distressing experience, not at all what I thought wikipedia was about. Wow. RegionMediaACT (talk) 06:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I completely do not understand what is happening - this has been an absolutely baffling day.
 * On my first day drafting an article for wikipedia, I've tried to write something informative about a digital news platform, in exactly the same style as multiple other news organisations operating in our area.
 * I've removed anything self promoting and provided multiple external links about the organisation, from reputable third party bodies in the media including the Australian national broadcaster and two prominent universities.
 * I am not being paid to write this. Why are these articles about other local news companies OK, but mine is not?
 * The Canberra Times
 * WIN Television
 * ABC Radio Canberra
 * Australian Community Media
 * Prime7 News
 * I have been knocked back once, treated with real rudeness - if not contempt - by at least one editor while asking for help, received multiple confusing responses, told I responded too quickly, told I shouldn't be on wiki commons and now I'm being blocked.
 * The site itself is almost impossible to navigate without experience, so I had to google externally to find answers to quite simple tasks.
 * Is this how wikipedia is supposed to work? I feel bullied and shocked at how confusing, negative and difficult the experience has been over the course of no more than a few hours.
 * All I want to do is submit an article - similar to the above - about an interesting local media organisation. This has been a genuinely awful and quite distressing experience, not at all what I thought wikipedia was about. Wow
 * RegionMediaACT (talk) 08:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RegionMediaACT


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:RegionMediaACT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)