User talk:Regman007

Speedy deletion of Samir Zeinoun
A tag has been placed on Samir Zeinoun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. The link you provided is a personal link and is not suitable for wikipedia. Even on the site you listed as a reference it only mentions a lawsuit. Please do not add it again or your will be reported to an adminstrator.
 * --Eternalsleeper (talk) 22:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Samir Geagea
I am sorry to hear about this person. The link you gave as a reference is to a private site and it does not even mention anything other then a lawsuit. Samir Geagea is a leader and all the evidence you have is a private web site dedicated to this person who was executed? How do you know how old I am?
 * --Eternalsleeper (talk) 03:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Why don't you make your comment less POV and put that he accuses Geagea of ordering the execution? I am going to change the wording because there is a court case against Samir Geagea for a reason- because it's an unproven allegation that he wishes to challenge in court.
 * --Eternalsleeper (talk) 05:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. provide THIRD party citings Eli  +  14:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eli +  09:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated addition of defamatory content despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Please choose your wording more prudently. Doczilla STOMP! 09:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I can see why you're frustrated, but here's the thing: at Wikipedia, we try to resolve disputes by discussing them, and looking at your contributions it seems you've put most or all of your energy into edit warring instead of justifying your actions. Please remember to use talk pages to develop consensus in tough situations; it's difficult to get the hang of, but works out much better for all involved in the long run. The trick is not just being right, but also convincing others that your are right. If you agree to stop reverting and instead discuss your edits, I might support an unblock. The ball is in your court. – Luna Santin  (talk) 01:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)